simple@lemm.ee to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoSkyblivion, the fan remake of Oblivion in Skyrim's engine, nears completionwww.tweaktown.comexternal-linkmessage-square115fedilinkarrow-up1570arrow-down14 cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1566arrow-down1external-linkSkyblivion, the fan remake of Oblivion in Skyrim's engine, nears completionwww.tweaktown.comsimple@lemm.ee to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square115fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareGeniuslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·7 hours agoI disagree with the fundamental assertion that work is more important when it’s paid.
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 hours agoDon’t get me wrong, fuck Bethesda, but they’re the owners of the IP…whatever they say is more important is more important, paid or not…
minus-squareGeniuslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-24 hours agoI disagree with the fundamental assertion that software can be owned
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoAnd that’s completely valid. However, under the current legal framework, that simply isn’t the case.
minus-squareGeniuslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·3 hours agoWhy are you using a state’s laws to determine your own sense of morality?
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 hour agoPersonal beliefs and the laws to which you are upheld are two different things. I didn’t say I agree with the law. Why are you assuming my personal beliefs?
minus-squareGeniuslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 hour agoBecause you said what they say is important is more important. That sounds like a subjective opinion to me, not an interpretation of the law.
I disagree with the fundamental assertion that work is more important when it’s paid.
Don’t get me wrong, fuck Bethesda, but they’re the owners of the IP…whatever they say is more important is more important, paid or not…
I disagree with the fundamental assertion that software can be owned
And that’s completely valid. However, under the current legal framework, that simply isn’t the case.
Why are you using a state’s laws to determine your own sense of morality?
Personal beliefs and the laws to which you are upheld are two different things. I didn’t say I agree with the law. Why are you assuming my personal beliefs?
Because you said what they say is important is more important. That sounds like a subjective opinion to me, not an interpretation of the law.