• Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    134
    ·
    8 months ago

    I have a working theory that Donald Duck comics never got popular in the US because of the ever-present scathing critique of capitalism

    • snor10@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      8 months ago

      They’re not!? Colour me surprised!

      Super popular in Sweden, at least when I grew up.

      • Even_Adder@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        8 months ago

        Donald got comics in Sweden that characterized him completely differently than how he’s shown in the US. I think he’s a much better character there.

        • Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          8 months ago

          Donald was always a more appealing character to me than Mickey Mouse because he’s so relateable. He has trouble with love and with money and he’s impulsive and impatient.
          Mickey, on the other hand, is such a nothing-character. He’s basically just a brand mascot at this point, with no recognizeable character traits.
          And while there are iterations of Mickey that actually give him a personality, it’s much less consistent than Donald.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        I recall them being popular in Germany, too, but yeah, they never took off like that here in the US.

        • snor10@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          Disney had (has?) a very strong cultural position in Sweden.

          It’s a Christmas tradition to watch a TV broadcast of a Disney cartoon medley that started 1960 and is still going strong, the majority of Swedes watch it every year.

          Before the dedicated cartoon channels made their debut in the latter half of the 90’s, the only time you could watch cartoons where on Friday night, and it was all Disney. It was called Disneydags, or Time for Disney translated.

        • snor10@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          Sweden in the 90’s and 00’s kids would collect the Disney pocket books like they where shonen manga.

          The spines would make a continuous picture and having no gaps where a mark of pride.

          • kerf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Spot on! I looked upon my collection with pride when I visited my parents last time. Even have most of the early ones where only half of the spreads were printed in color

            • snor10@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Haha, nostalgin alltså.

              Samlade aldrig själv, men hade vänner som var galna i Kalle Anka pocketböcker lol.

          • Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            Was it also possible to subscribe to the pocket books in Sweden? I had a subscription growing up in Iceland (Donald Duck is huge over there as well)

            • snor10@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              I didn’t collect them myself, so I actually don’t know.

              But it seems like a pretty safe bet to assume you could.

              What is Donald Duck called in Icelandic? In Sweden he is kalled Kalle Anna and in Denmark I think Anders And.

              Hewey Dewey and Lewey is called Knatte Fnatte and Tjatte.

              • Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                The comics were only available in Danish for a while so we mostly took the Danish names, so in Icelandic Donald is Andrés Önd (similar to Anders And).
                The nephews are Ripp, Rapp and Rupp (Rip, Rap and Rup in Danish).
                Funnily enough there’s a generational gap between people who call Goofy Fedtmule (the Danish name) or Guffi (the Icelandic translation name)!

          • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            The spines would make a continuous picture and having no gaps where a mark of pride.

            That usually only happens in “complete collections” or something like that in the US. With any medium, I mean. Movies, books, comics, etc… And it doesn’t always happen, either.

    • FedFer@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      8 months ago

      In Italy, for some reason, Mickey Mouse comics (including a lot of Donald Duck stories) are SUPER popular, Donald’s depicted as always in debt, losing any job he can get and going on extreme life-threatening adventures with Scrooge just to get a cent off his uncle’s debt list, but nobody uses this to actually think that this might be a real world problem and brushes it off as an exaggeration. Are Italians (including me) blind?

      • snooggums@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        8 months ago

        That’s because he was shown to care about a few people he was related to without needing to give up his vast amount of wealth.

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          This despite him being named after Ebeneezer Scrooge for a reason. I guess he was post-ghost visit Scrooge.

      • Holyhandgrenade@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        Funny thing is, I feel like the new Ducktales series is the closest TV representation of the comics-versions of the characters. They change some things (most crucially they give Huey, Dewey and Louie individual personality traits), but overall it really feels like watching the European comic books come to life. Scrooge is still too much of a good guy, where in the comics he’s often a kind of villain.

    • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      That would sadly explain it. We only recently got out of the Temporarily Embarrassed Millionaire phase and only because we were basically forced to.

    • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      8 months ago

      Now adjust for inflation. The comic was published in 1989. $1 then is $2.48 today. That’s a cumulative price increase of 148.22%, or an average price increase of 2.71% per year for 34 years. It is 4:30am, I am on a shuttle bus, and I am not showing any signs of going to sleep anytime soon.

    • gordon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Let’s see, you posted this about 19 hours ago, starting value was 315 with a bunch of zeros… yeah someone else can do the math, but I think our buddy scrooge will be just fine.

    • takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, this could be done better and would still send a message without unnecessary exaggeration.

      • ivanafterall@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Are you suggesting that Scrooge McDuck’s net worth is less than $310 quadrillion? Second question: how do you know?

      • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Bro, it’s a comic. They’re not trying to send a message, it’s supposed to be ridicilous.

      • wandermind@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        I mean, THE main character traits of Scrooge McDuck are that he’s stingy and absolutely ludicrously filthy rich.

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          being a billionaire is already filthy fucking rich.

          let’s replace it with everyone’s most hated cunt, the Muskrat estimated networth at 225 billion.

          let’s say he loses a million every minute, which is let’s be honest still a shitton of money, literally life-changing for at least 95% of the planet.

          well at that rate of losses 1 million every minute

          it would still take him 177 days to lose all his networth.

          increase it to 1 million every hour, which is still a very good rate to be losing “money” and it takes him 29 years to lose it.

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Lol nah, they absolutely have messages and have always had them.

          No media can ever be there to have no message and only to entertain. They all have an underlying message whether it’s intentional or not because that is how all stories are made comic book or not.

    • bane_killgrind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Nobody is actually this wealthy, it implies Scrooge McDuck has more than 525 trillion dollars.

      Elon could only lose a half million dollars every minute if he was going broke in 600 years.

      Edit I screwed up my math someone correct me

      • vortic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        That’s off by a bit:

        600 years * 365 days/year * 24 hours/day * 60 minutes/hour = 315,360,000 minutes

        315,360,000 minutes * $1,000,000,000/minute = $315,360,000,000,000,000 or $315 Quadrillon

        For Musk:

        $225.5B current NW

        $225,500,000,000 / 315,360,000 minutes = $715/minute

  • tweeks@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    Well, he has a position to uphold; what about future generations growing up with a broke Scrooge.