• Nobody@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    What an incredible time and labor intensive fetish. No kink shame though. You do you, chart-making cousin fucker.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I mean, can you really say for all practical purposes you’re related if Joe Bob is both of your great great great great uncles? After so many generations it ceases to be relevant.

      • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        More than second cousins and it’s pretty irrelevant anyway. If they’re the same ethnicity as you there’s a good chance you’re some sort of cousins anyway. (Well humanity had a common ancestor so EVERYONE is kinda your cousin, eh)

    • Aggravationstation@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      You chart-making, cousin-fucking, low down son of a bitch. Had to put that after it came into my head.

      But yea, who gives a shit really. I’ve got cousins I’d fuck given half a chance.

    • evranch@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      7 months ago

      My wife is literally from the other side of the world… So now you have me wondering who our last common ancestor could be and how many degrees removed we are.

      • darkpanda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        7 months ago

        My wife and I both have Scottish ancestry. Turns out there’s a chance a clan I descended from may have nearly genocided a clan she descended from, and if they had completed the job back in the day there’s a good chance she wouldn’t have been born. A few from her clan were let go to spread the word to others to not fuck around, and she’s descended from one of them.

      • deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Lol, that actually sounds like fun to investigate, and i’m a bit jealous. My SO and I both have family that lived in rural Arkansas up until the early-to-mid 1900s. We stopped asking questions after we discovered that because we don’t want to end up having to ask how close is too close. We’re definitely not 2nd cousins or anything, and it’s doubtful that our respective “rural Arkansas” is the same place. But my grandfather was an orphan, so that side of the family tree is particularly murky…

        Oh! Only tangentially related, but I have a second cousin out in Alabama who married her step-brother. They didn’t become step-siblings until they were in their late teens, so it’s not like they grew up together (well, not anymore so than kids the same age in a small town), but still… Roll Tide.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      True, but considering I’m Jewish as far back as we can trace and there are no Jews in her ancestry as far back as she can trace, we’re pretty distant cousins.

  • Num10ck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    i wonder what percentage of people understand that all living things on earth share a common ancestor.

    • qyron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not enough.

      I was fortunate enough to sit through an impromptu family tree debate after I had been made aware that to some degree we are all related.

      I lack the words to adequately describe the reactions of shock and horror when people who had been married for decades suddenly realized they shared real and somewhat close blood relation, some times only two or three generations apart.

    • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 months ago

      People in small towns especially, go back only a couple generations and they all start merging. Then they act shocked our town of <5000 people is all related

    • BleatingZombie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      This might be a really dumb question, but is it possible that any two human beings don’t share a common ancestor? Like, do we all link back to a single bacteria or were there multiple “made” at once?

      • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        7 months ago

        There is a genetic Adam and Eve. However, I don’t think they existed at the same time. These were humans, not just apes/mammals/animals/bacteria. We are all distantly related.

        We are also more related to mushrooms than trees are to mushrooms.

        • nul@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          7 months ago

          Yeah, it’s hard to pin down when these common ancestors lived precisely, especially given that as portions of our genome go extinct, the common ancestor will change.

          But Y-chromosomal Adam is estimated to have lived around 200,000 years ago, while estimates for when Mitochondrial Eve lived are a bit more recent, around 150,000 years ago.

            • nul@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              According to an unverified internet search, the average age of childbirth for women throughout history is 23.2 years, and for men it is 30.7.

              So, statistically, your great^6463 grandmother is the same as mine. Same goes for our great^6512 grandfather.

                • DasAlbatross@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  They were freaks. They didn’t have as many generations of separation so they were definitely fucking their cousin at best.

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        A quarter of us trace back to one mongol, fairly certain there’s going to be a point we all tie together to the same ape eating magic mushrooms in what would become Africa. Long ass time ago though

      • Communist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        No, all humans share a common ancestor, as does all multicellular life. Google clades for more info.

      • GojuRyu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        With how funky micro organisms are with sharing DNA I’m not sure it matters. I’ve heard it likened to the genetic tree turning into a bush instead whare it’s a big mes of sharing of DNA across species.

    • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      That doesn’t mean fucking someone that close to you doesn’t come with risks.

      But as long as it’s not multigenerational it’s a very small increase to the already small percentage of defects.

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        7 months ago

        If it required charts to explain and took years to work out then I’m guessing it probably wasn’t first cousin’s, and may not have even been second cousins. By the time you are at that level the risk is probably barely different than picking someone from the same country as you at random.

  • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    “The blood of the covenant is thicker than the water of the womb.”

    The saying (basically) means “the bond with the friends you make is stronger than happenstance family”.

    Remember, don’t be bullied by family members who use “family” as their excuse to get you to do what they want without consideration of your own thoughts or feelings.

    Happy Thanksgiving!

    • tombombadil@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 months ago

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_is_thicker_than_water

      Two modern commentators, author Albert Jack and Messianic Rabbi Richard Pustelniak, claim that the original meaning of the expression was that the ties between people who have made a blood covenant (or have shed blood together in battle) were stronger than ties formed by “the water of the womb”, thus “The blood of the covenant is thicker than the water of the womb”. Neither of the authors cite any sources to support their claim.

  • flicker@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    Now, this is a man who knows how to marry his cousin!

    …wow. Didn’t know how much I would enjoy getting to say that until now. Elroy! I get it now!

  • peereboominc@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Only 10 generations away (about 100-150 years), you already have 1024 ancestors. 20 generations and you have 1.048.576. And 30 generations get you 1.073.741.824.

    In 1500 the world only had 450.000.000

    This example only shows the direct family line (parents of parents of…) and no descendents of brothers and sisters.

    And the world did not start 500 years ago

    Needless to say, we are all a bunch of inbreds