If I understand Lemmy correctly, you can create duplicate communities on different instances. Isn’t this kinda counter productive because this may lead to less user interaction in those communities, because the user base gets split up between competing communities.

Is there a way to fight this division of the (small) userbase or is this effect even desired because it leads to more tight knit communities on the different instances?

    • Flashback956@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      ‘Stop asking this’ is not a really helpful thing to say. We have a lot of new users, including myself, and everybody is figuring out how Lemmy works. Redundant questions will occur and lets answer those in a respectful manner.

  • Ghost_Seeker69@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think this is desired. Lemme give my case. I think r/historymemes is absolutely flooded with racism, tankies and neo-nazis, and perhaps more than the rest, colonial apologia. Reddit being centralised, I can’t create another r/historymemes.

    Say we have a c/historymemes in some instance. The same racism and shit happens. No problem, I can look for a new c/historymemes on some other instance that is better moderated in regards to those problems.

  • softhat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I suspect it doesn’t really matter - users can see all of the communities across all of the instances when they search, and they can choose which ones are of interest to them.

    • Kasrean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      it matters a lot. if something is happening you want a quick overview of big discussion and not jump between a bunch of 10 small discussion rooms.

  • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yea, it’s an endless debate lately.

    Just subscribe to everything, and use your judgment where to post if you post. We can already see some clear bias towards the largest ones so it’s possible the small clones will be left behind.

    Or not and dupes will remain. Wait and sew after things settle down a bit.

  • DemigodrickA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, limit instances to X number of communities. Forces people to use the search function properly, stops the large instances having all the communities, also has the positive effect of the user base spreading out rather than congregating on one or two big communities.

    • WhoRoger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem is, instances won’t be aware of each other communities unless someone searches for the specific community url of the other instance. Until then, basic community search won’t reveal them.

      Let’s just wait.

  • semibreve42@lemmy.dupper.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think it’s a valid question. I think there is value in allowing separate communities, but it makes discovery harder.

    It would be nice to see a way of creating meta lists with one click signup functionality, so curated lists can be created.

    And/or the ability for communities to be able to link perhaps? So they become functionally one community, but with the ability to split remaining in the individual admins control.

  • Aardonyx@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The most effective solution is to search for existing communities on federated instances before creating a new one on your instance. Then new communities are ideally only made if the existing community doesn’t meet your particular need or specific interest (eg. UnitedKingdom vs UKCasual), or if your instance doesn’t federate with the main community.

    The same dispersion of userbase is present on reddit but the more popular urls/content will eventually become clear and less popular communities will either aggregate into the main one or become more niche (eg r/games vs r/gaming).

  • godless@latte.isnot.coffee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why fight it? If they want 3 different asklemmy instances, let them. Eventually users will flock to the most active one, or there will be parallel ones. Then it’s on you to either join all or stick to whichever one you feel most welcome at.

  • Squarg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d rather have multiple small communities than monolithic ones in most cases personally, that and it avoids the reddit problem of being forced to use a subreddit despite bad/creepy mods cause you can just make your own version in another instance