And since you won’t be able to modify web pages, it will also mean the end of customization, either for looks (ie. DarkReader, Stylus), conveniance (ie. Tampermonkey) or accessibility.

The community feedback is… interesting to say the least.

  • jabjoe@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is exactly the kind of thing that demostrates why DRM shouldn’t be part of the web standards. It’s very existence is abuse and this use even more so.

    DRM needs to be illegal.

        • Amju Wolf@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Democracy is an illusion, especially in places like the US. There are so many abstraction layers that even if you “win” you are really poorly represented.

          • jabjoe@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Democ­ra­cy is the worst form of gov­ern­ment, except for all the oth­ers.”

    • jjdelc@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I feel that rather than DRM being illegal, Google and Chromium browsers having monopoly on the web is what allows these crazy ideas to have any room.

      If the browser market was more evenly spread and there were more parties involved, these ideas woldn’t fly so easily.

      • jabjoe@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The push/money/dark-force behind this was more Disney and co. Tech only really cared about killing Flash and all the other extensions used to do DRM. If DRM wasn’t allowed in the first place, none of would have existed.