• BB69@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      43
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean Paul Ryan is only 53 now and was elected to office when he was 29. He is pretty young. McCarthy is only 58. Eric Cantor is the oldest at 62.

      Definitely young and around the age you want leaders to be.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        … 40’s are middle aged adults.

        “Young” is 18-19, maybe mid 20’s.

        Stop infantilizing entire generations of grown-ass adults

        • GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          This makes me think of Sen. Strom Thurmond, who when he was in his 80s it came out he had an affair when he was in his 40s, and he said it was no big deal, that it was just a “youthful indiscretion”.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Was that about when Elsie mae Williams came out as his secret daughter ? Her mom was 15 when Williams was born…

        • Ech@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Chill out my dude. Saying someone is young in the context of their peers isn’t “infantilizing” anyone.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            no. first. you’re wrong it is.

            You see, people past their fifties still treat me like a child… even though I’ve maintained two steady careers- simultaneously, because fuck this economy- for nearly two decades now. I am a grown-ass adult, and you do not get to dismiss, patronize or indeed infantilize me just because I happen to have a different opinion than you. that’s just being ageist.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Infantilizing.

          Good God Lemmy, not everything is a condition/syndrome/loaded action.

          • Honytawk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Language changes, learn to deal with it or fall behind, gramps.

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago
            1. did I say that? no. I didn’t.
            2. I know many 18 YO’s who are far more mature than a certain ex president, and at least as mature as the current one. age is an extremely poor indicator of one’s maturity, capability or the quality of their experience.
            • BB69@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Who cares? It doesn’t matter that “18 years olds are on the battlefield”.

              Knife cuts both ways. I know 90 years olds more cognizant than some 20 year olds.

              I don’t want either of them leading a nation

              • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah? I never mentioned warfare, those were other commenters.

                The knife cuts both ways, but only one way is constitutionally sanctioned. Funny how that works.

                • BB69@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Because the majority of 35 and under don’t have the experience in life or law or professionalism to hold an elder statesman position? They can still be elected to the house of reps to earn that experience. Or hold state offices.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        53 to 62 is by no means young. It may not be elderly, but it’s past middle aged.

        The “ideal age” for a political leader is a bag of worms that it’s difficult to get into without immediately falling into several different types of ageism.

        The world lived in by a 60 year old for most of their adult life was radically different from the modern world, and has many differences from the world as experienced by the majority of Americans.
        That doesn’t necessarily make them a worse leader, just like more experience in life doesn’t necessarily make them better, but it definitely raises concerns about disconnection from modern issues.

        • BB69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well I gave their current ages. They were 20 years younger when elected.

          62 isn’t spring chicken, but it isn’t Feinstein zombie old.

          40ish is definitely a good age to be voted in and prove yourself talented enough to lead for another 20-30 years.

          • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You straight up called 58 young, and said they’re young and the age you want. “McCarthy is only 53. (…) He is pretty young”.

            I’d rather judge candidates in their abilities and policies than on their age. Regardless of their age, these politicians are unpalatable.

            • BB69@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You totally rephrased my comment wtf.

              I mean Paul Ryan is only 53 now and was elected to office when he was 29. He is pretty young. McCarthy is only 58. Eric Cantor is the oldest at 62.

              Definitely young and around the age you want leaders to be.

              I was talking about Paul Ryan, who has been out of office for years. 58 isn’t ancient either.

              The entire comment string was about how these three were “greying” in the photo. Nobody mentioned policy or abilities to me. Don’t forget, Paul Ryan quit because he knew how the party was going to turn out. Seems like a good man to me.

              • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Getting the name wrong was my mistake, but I’d hardly call it totally rephrasing your comment. Intent was to remove the extraneous portion in the middle.

                No one said it’s ancient, but it’s definitely not “young”. They’re all close to retirement age.

        • BB69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And retirement age isn’t until 65 or so in the majority of countries.

          • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Being less than 10 years from retirement makes you old.

            How is this not clear?

            • BB69@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Besides the fact that’s not true, none of these men were that old when the picture was taken.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m younger than they are and I’m not young at 46. I own a home and have a teenage daughter. Obviously I’m not young.

              • Honytawk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you have to work 40 years, then being in the last 10 years means you are old.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      Young compared to the embalmed geriatrics that run the country.

      Senate comes from Latin “senex”, which literally means “old man”. Go figure, walking corpses have run the world since antiquity.

      • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        It used to make sense. Not a lot of technology shifts between 2,000 BC and 1,000 AD. You wanted the folks who actually remembered what to do in case of an earthquake or tidal wave. It’s different today; I recently looked up an article about Obama written in 2008. He was considered a big innovator because he owned a Blackberry.

  • cantstopthesignal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    They have thoroughly nuked their bench. If we are still a democracy in the future they will have no one to take of the mantle but for clowns and hucksters.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seems to win them elections with some fair regularity, why would they change anything?

      They’re evil clowns pandering to other evil clowns, it’s evil clowns the whole way.

    • phoneymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Their bench is wackos. As much as I disagree with their positions, I do wish we had a stable Republican Party full of people who at least wanted to work in good faith and not set the place on fire to get their way.

  • Ook the Librarian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    For context, this is the cover of a 2010 book. These were going to be the guys. Surely one of this bunch will be president some day.

    Eric Cantor was the House Majority Leader. That’s a pretty big deal. He got primaried by a tea partier in 2014. It seems quaint now, but it was a big fucking deal at the time. Never has there been someone so high ranking that the party’s electorate kicked out. Cantor was in good standing, but their public was becoming a monster.

    The other two were more recently chewed up, but I’ll let someone else tell those stories.

  • IHadTwoCows@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This could’ve been a good politic topic, but instead people are in here acting offended by a word and calling everyone “ageist”. Holy shit, people…look at this fucking thread ans ask yourself why anyone would trust your political choices.

  • profdc9@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just because you have chaps, a holster, tall boots, a 10 gallon hat, and a revolver, doesn’t make you a cowboy.