• nao@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds good, is there any reason why their assets should not be used to compensate for the damages they are causing?

    • Brainsploosh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m guessing because a lot of them aren’t clearly marked “Russian state war chest part 12”, but rather things like “Gazprom reserve fund” or “Oligarchs discretionary fund” which would muddy the border between state and private assets.

      State assets might be fine to seize to cover state costs, but the legality of seizing the others’ might by grayer.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d think that’s why they haven’t been tapped this far. They’re holding out to see if they can hand the Ukrainians something when this shit show is over.

      • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Which is super fucked they’re waiting. Probably waited for Hitler to win to congratulate him on doing the dirty work for 'em, t✡️✡️ and c✡️mpen$ate him für sein/der Kampf or waseva

          • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Why wouldn’t they straight up liquidate and convert it all to weapons like even more directly and promptly and publicly than what you’re saying? Or have i just equivocated that which youmre saying (I’m a little uncertain I’m inferring what you’re intending)

            Edit: like, why wait? Screw the neutrality shit or whatever

    • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      To what extent would that a be a larger question for like Switzerland and other Russian/dirty-money-heavy shelter jurisdictions?

    • chitak166@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      is there any reason why their assets should not be used to compensate for the damages they are causing?

      Losers who would also be responsible for the failure that was Reconstruction.