floofloof@lemmy.ca to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoGoogle will no longer hold onto people's location data in Google Maps — meaning it can't turn that info over to the policewww.businessinsider.comexternal-linkmessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up1487arrow-down15cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1482arrow-down1external-linkGoogle will no longer hold onto people's location data in Google Maps — meaning it can't turn that info over to the policewww.businessinsider.comfloofloof@lemmy.ca to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square57fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squarejennwiththesea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoThat means that you’re the product
minus-squareSuckMyWang@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoWhat have google ever done to not trust them?
minus-squaresilentknyght@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIt’s believable. If 25% of the warrants they receive are for location data, there is a shed load of money to be saved by simply not storing it. Probably simple math, whether or not the stored location data is more valuable than the cost of legal compliance.
I’m not buying it.
That means that you’re the product
What have google ever done to not trust them?
It’s believable. If 25% of the warrants they receive are for location data, there is a shed load of money to be saved by simply not storing it.
Probably simple math, whether or not the stored location data is more valuable than the cost of legal compliance.