• GustavoM@lemmy.worldEnglish
      31·
      1 year ago

      Amen. I’m just waiting for them to screw everything up and I’ll follow along.

      t. Currently using Brave

      • PlantJam@lemmy.worldEnglish
        91·
        1 year ago

        No need to wait, Firefox is already a strong competitor (in terms of features, not market share). Adblock on Firefox mobile makes mobile sites so much easier to use.

        • moitoi@feddit.deEnglish
          8·
          1 year ago

          I don’t know how people navigate the internet without adblock on mobile. Each website is a nightmare with the majority of the screen being ads.

          • capacitor@reddthat.comEnglish
            0·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, ff mobile may be complete garbage UX/security wise, but its the only usable mobile browser IMO, simply because of ublock support.

              • capacitor@reddthat.comEnglish
                1·
                1 year ago

                According to the GrapheneOS docs

                Firefox does not have internal sandboxing on Android.

                Apparently Firefox’s sandbox is still substantially weaker than chromium and it is currently much more vulnerable to exploitation.

                • d3vnu1l@programming.devEnglish
                  1·
                  1 year ago

                  Oh that’s right. I read the same thing some time ago and had completely forgotten. Thanks for bringing it up.

        • Black616Angel@feddit.deEnglish
          31·
          1 year ago

          It really isn’t though. I also started using Firefox recently and I miss tab groups on mobile as well as on my PC. Yes, there is the simple tab groups add-on, but it just doesn’t compare.
          Brave is also easier to set up ad-blocking, because it comes with ad-block enabled and script-blocking two clicks away.

          Don’t get me wrong, I will continue to use FF, but Brave has some features, FF does not have (yet).

          • Cavemanfreak@lemm.eeEnglish
            2·
            1 year ago

            Tab groups is the biggest thing I’m missing after I made the switch the other week. I’m used to having loads of tabs open, so not being able to easily minimize the ones I’m currently using is annoying to say the least.

            One plus is containers. Only opening Meta sites in their own container, same with Google/Youtube is pretty neat.

            • elscallr@lemmy.worldEnglish
              0·
              1 year ago

              Tab groups and container tabs are the two things I want. Tab groups I’m missing a lot. The extension is not available on mobile.

              • Cavemanfreak@lemm.eeEnglish
                11·
                1 year ago

                Remembered one more thing; in Firefox I can only have 31 tabs open before the scroll bar appears. In Chrome it’s closer to 90-100! That’s kinda huge imo.

                  • Cavemanfreak@lemm.eeEnglish
                    1·
                    1 year ago

                    I did set the tabMinWidth first, but the result was… lackluster… to say the least (I like having ~50-100 tabs per window…). However, I JUST found out about userChrome.css before you wrote, and also found code that worked for it!

                    For anyone else interested:

                    Guide on creating the userChrome.css file: https://www.userchrome.org/how-create-userchrome-css.html

                    Code that should be added to the file: .tabbrowser-tab { min-width: 1em !important; clip-width: 1em !important; }

          • younity@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            1 year ago

            I use firefox and I have ascended from a lifestyle of tab fiefdom. I only have a handful of tabs open at a time, no more than 5… hell, I have my browser closed 100% of the time unless I’m actively browsing. Couldn’t you just create a folder which bookmarks, then “open all” bookmarks to open a virtual “tab group”?