The Journal reported executives at SpaceX worried Elon Musk was on drugs after an “unhinged” all-hands meeting in which he slurred and rambled.

  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I will admit, him being on drugs did not occur to me as a possible explanation for his ‘taking tesla private’ tweet that torpeedoed his networth, but having been confronted by it now I am having a hard time not believing it.

    • athos77@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Musk’s drug use, which includes LSD, cocaine, ecstasy, and ketamine, according to people familiar with the matter, is at the center of an extensive new report from The Journal that details how executives at several of the billionaire’s companies have struggled to manage his substance use and erratic behavior.

      • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        37
        ·
        11 months ago

        Just FYI

        According to people familiar with the matter

        Means “We have no source for this and are probably making it up”

        Business Insider is a tabloid shitrag these days

        • athos77@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Just FYI, “according to people familiar with the matter” generally means people who are speaking on background and asked to have their identifies protected. I guarantee you that the reporters and their editor(s) know the people involved and have good reason to believe they’re familiar with the situation and are reliable sources of information.

          • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            11 months ago

            Were it a respectable publication I’d agree, but Business Insider has gone rapidly downhill the last couple of years, and is now Daily-Mail-Level tripe

        • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          11 months ago

          This is based on a Wall Street Journal report (which I didn’t link because it’s paywalled), so your strange anger at BI is a wee bit misplaced.

          • Uglyhead@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            11 months ago

            Dude is hanging out in a dedicated misogyny porn community.

            10 to 1 a MuskRat and just angry his man is being talked about badly.

            • renzev@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              “Hey there nice post. Unfortunately, here is some bullshit I dug up from your comment history which clearly demonstrates that you are unworthy of expressing your opinion”

              Not defending that guy, just really wish this type of behavior would just die along with the rest of r*ddit already. Something something ad hominem falacy

              • Uglyhead@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Oh I tend agree, if I was arguing directly against him it would be foul.

                However looking through peoples past comments and where they tend to hang out can infer a lot about the person.

          • Ooops@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            11 months ago

            No. Media bullshit is sitting at the core of a lot of today’s problems and the massive polarisation on basically any topic.

            Anger at low level journalism rags and even more at outlets trying to look respectable while actually having a similiar quality (and that definitely includes Business Insider ever since they were bought by the shithole of journalism that is Axel Springer SE) cannot be misplaced at all.

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              I mean, I’m all on board with anger at BI. It’s not that. It’s the WSJ article is the OP topic, it’s like ranting about Star Trek at a Star Wars convention. Not that it’s wrong, just misplaced or at least out of context.