Dan Pfeiffer: “To summarize, Johnson demands a border bill in exchange for passing Ukraine aid; the White House and Senate work on a border bill; Johnson opposes the bill without even seeing it, despite repeatedly declaring that the ‘crisis at the border’ is the House GOP’s top priority.”
“Some commentary suggests that Johnson keeps moving the goalpost to prevent his caucus from having to vote on Ukraine aid, which is vehemently opposed by MAGA Republicans but enthusiastically supported by the Republican establishment and more moderate GOPers. With Johnson in perpetual danger of being McCarthy-ed, I am sure avoiding a tough vote is a factor. However, I think Johnson and the Republicans have another more nefarious reason — they want a crisis at the border to help them in the election.”
Yeah, no kidding. They’ve been offered lots of ways of doing immigration reform and have zero interest. Also, they typically reject the idea of arresting and imprisoning the very top of companies that employ undocumented workers.
If they really meant what they say about how jobs are being “taken” from citizens, wouldn’t they back such a thing? It’d be easy to shut down a lot of the employment of undocumented workers. Walk into Tyson or some other big company, arrest those at the very top (not low-level clerks; I’m talking C-suite people) and entertain the idea of REVOKING corporate charters of companies that do this.
All it would take is one extremely high-profile example and it would be a sea change. Do Republicans mean what they say, though? Of course not.
They know some industries don’t have the labor and would crumble. They only care to the point that people at the bottom have someone to blame for their problems, and its not the ones actually causing harm. The ‘they hate the same things as me’ party.
Republicans “we need to create a problem to blame the Democrats for, you know, like we usually do…”
And if Republicans won’t cooperate in fixing the border problem, they are in fact, causing it.
Fascists deliberately create chaos so they can try to sell you the idea that they’re the only ones who can end the chaos.
Back in the day, the Nazis would hold rallies in Communist neighborhoods. There’d be a riot, and the Nazis would make sure the locals got the blame. “Only a strong leader can prevent this chaos.”
Removed by mod
Every accusation is a confession, and they make a lot of accusations about Democrats regarding border security.
Their goal posts are always on wheels.
Yeah. Specifically, a crisis in which russia no longer recognizes the border with Alaska.
The unsaid GOP position isn’t just to defend the border, but to completely stop all immigration of non-whites and non-Christians while deporting the ones who are here (legal or not). Anything less than that won’t be enough for them.
But, perhaps like Roe vs. Wade, I think they want the (manufactured) constant fear of immigration looming over their voter base. I’d be willing to bet that many higher up R’s know full well that immigrants play a vital role in the economy, and that the right-wing policies would hurt the country. But by all means, demonize and throw them under the bus in the name of activating your base.
Oh they absolutely know immigration is essential to the economy, or at least their profits. Otherwise we would see them going after businesses that hire illegal immigrants instead of pushing a pointless wall.
Also the AfD position, but they’re a bit more upfront about it.
Republicans - Chicken Littles every one - want disaster to prove them right. They ignore every word anybody says to them that isn’t already something they say to themselves. It’s like their consciousness is password operated. If you don’t say the right words and mean the right things by them, they regard you as subhuman and just go back to doing whatever they were doing. All the “isms” are operating at full swing in their brains and there’s not really anyone home, which is why they panic so easily, because it would be super embarrassing for it to be demonstrated that they have no idea what you’re talking about or why it’s important.
The 2018 midterms were fucking insane.
It’s the old cycle-
“Americans don’t want to work.”
“Okay, so let’s let immigrants do the work.”
“We can’t let immigrants steal the jobs!”
“Okay, so hire Americans.”
“Americans don’t want to work.”
Removed by mod
Johnson Johnson Johnson Johnson Johnson
Johnson
Traitor Johnson.Removed by mod
51st state? How about 51-65th state? Have you ever spoken to a Mexican that lives in Mexico?
It’s pretty clear the mexican population would rather be part of our country, and not separated by all these barriers.
It’s not at all clear that that’s the case.
And once, most of western America WAS part of Mexico.
Maybe you should give those lands back to Mexico. Way fewer people would be changing countries than if Mexico joined the USA.
allow our capitalism to help put money into the coffers of the people of mexico
You know that they have capitalism in Mexico too right?
Removed by mod
As a Canadian I also sometimes envy the opportunities that exist in the USA but I absolutely would not want Canada to be a 51st (& 52nd?) state. (Not would I actually seek to move there)
You do know that even though they have capitalism in Mexico, it doesn’t trickle down to benefit any of the people there, right?
Yes, this is an inherent challenge with capitalism (capital concentration).
I just do not understand why every concept that might work always has to be questioned this way as if it was anymore ridiculous or intolerable than he current migrant situation at the border.
I mean I think it’s important to question ideas before implementing them, but you’re right that your country (and mine) have some serious challenges to tackle with respect to migration. Mexico also struggles with migration across its southern (and coastal?) border(s).
It looks like in 2013 about 60% of Mexicans favoured forming a single country with the USA (if doing so would improve their standard of living). That data is over 10 years old and a lot has changed since then but honestly it’s higher than I would have thought.
Removed by mod
Yeah I’m also interested in reducing barriers to migration from a human rights perspective.
But I think we need to reduce international disparities in standard of living before open borders would really work.
I think trade penalties against countries with high degrees of wealth concentration and/or without living wage regulations etc might help. Idk.
Removed by mod
I’m going to take your post at face value to explore the foundational premise that the Mexican population wants to be part of the USA.
Do they? Sure, many come here, because of opportunities, but making Mexico a state won’t suddenly make Mexico rich. Hell, Central Pennsylvania has been a part of the US since the beginning, and it’s as poor as dirt.
I don’t know - I’m not qualified to speak on behalf of any immigrants, except perhaps my great-great-something Euro ancestors - but I suspect the Mexicans who come here do so despite the fact that it’s America, because it’s better than starving at home. Making them us is probably just as distasteful to them as is would be to the RePubeLickans. Now, if we could help make them more prosperous… that, they’d be happy about.
Aside from what other people are pointing out , it’s not reasonable to assume illegal immigrants from that border are even Mexican.
https://www.wola.org/2022/11/migration-country-by-country-at-the-u-s-mexico-border/
Removed by mod
