If you can find the part where they are "they clearly arent supportive of authoritarian of power. " you can point it out if you like. Be warned I might just throw that quote at you again
I think youre throwing the quote over and over cause you realized you misread it, but you cant admit you fucked up this deep in.
So you just keep resending the quote hoping Ill also misread it, and take that as a rebuttal.
Sadly for you I didnt get stumped by middle school lit class.
E: like, do you understand that the quote directly contradicts your issues with the game? That if you hadnt misused it so many times in this thread, I would be showing you that quote because it backs up my point?
It’s clear that we’re not going to agree. But I’m gonna just step out of this conversation because I’m done talking to someone who acts like… this. This is like reddit.
If you can find the part where they are "they clearly arent supportive of authoritarian of power. " you can point it out if you like. Be warned I might just throw that quote at you again
I think youre throwing the quote over and over cause you realized you misread it, but you cant admit you fucked up this deep in.
So you just keep resending the quote hoping Ill also misread it, and take that as a rebuttal.
Sadly for you I didnt get stumped by middle school lit class.
E: like, do you understand that the quote directly contradicts your issues with the game? That if you hadnt misused it so many times in this thread, I would be showing you that quote because it backs up my point?
It’s clear that we’re not going to agree. But I’m gonna just step out of this conversation because I’m done talking to someone who acts like… this. This is like reddit.
Bye bye.
Agreeing would imply you had an argument beyond copy pasting my own evidence.
And, again, talking would imply you said anything beyond c+v.
Read slower next time, I guess? It will save you the embarassment