• lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That’s probably part of the plan. They want the post office gone to make room for private companies. Fuck all the people that live in remote areas where it isn’t profitable to have mail I guess.

      • teamevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Which the stupid Republicans will use to continue to try to privatize something that should never have been privatized and should never be privatized The Republicans are the Nazis now and they need to be stopped

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Chinese packages are a net negative for the post office, you can probably find articles about that from Trump’s first term.

        • Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          I don’t know why you got down voted because it’s 100% true. NPR did a fairly good episode on it: https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2018/08/01/634737852/episode-857-the-postal-illuminati

          Edit: To summarize, there’s an international org (UPU) that controls the amount postal services can charge each other to deliver mail/parcels. The current due is below what it costs to actually deliver a parcel, so a package from China actually costs the USPS money. That cost gets passed on as higher domestic fees, leading to a situation where a shipper is charged ~5x more to ship something domestically compared to what a company in China is charged to ship to the US.

          • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            People don’t like when something Trump does could have good reasons. It does seem accidental in this case, but it doesn’t make it not true.

            • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              How about you wake up and stop painting shit in gold?

              Trump doing some good (which I don’t even think is the case here) is purely incidental to serving his own self interests.

          • bjorney@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Just because it’s a service doesn’t make the comment you are replying to any less correct. Cancelling inbound chinese shipments is negatively affecting quality of service, NOT revenue

          • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Just because it’s a service doesn’t mean it has to operate at a loss. Water is a service too, but you can’t bankrupt the water company by using 300x as much water.

              • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                8 hours ago

                Whether it’s public or private has no real bearing on my point though. Water consumption is priced to cover the cost of delivering the water. That isn’t the case in international shipping, the more packages from China for the USPS, the more money they lose.

                • solsangraal
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  the entire premise of your “point” is mind-bogglingly wrong. the USPS doesn’t make money, it costs money, just like any other org run by the government

                  how much revenue is the US military raking in? or are they “operating at a loss” too?

                  talking about ending the USPS because it’s “losing money” is the most bone-headed bullshit take on anything, ever. period

            • NewNewAccount@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Services can still cost money. Utilities, such as water, cost money but if the government is running them they do not need to produce profit.

              Republicans framing the postal service as a failed business venture is purposeful.

        • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The USPS was never intended to turn a profit. It’s not a business. Its entire purpose is to deliver mail to every American, regardless of where they’re located. Making that profitable was never realistic nor necessary for a government service.

          • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            8 hours ago

            It doesn’t have to profit, but it also doesn’t have to subsidize incoming packages from China.

              • bjorney@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                7 hours ago

                The UN Postal Union sets guidelines for international mail that dictates developing countries shouldn’t have to pay full price to send mail to developed countries. Basically if it costs $30 to ship something from a developing country, they would charge $20 and the destination country would pay for the shortfall (dollar values not real). China was a much smaller economy when this agreement was drafted.

                The US renegotiated this agreement with the United postal union in 2019/2020 but there were still come compromises made - while the amount of subsidization is minimal compared to 10 years ago, USPS still allegedly eats some losses on every package from China.

                Basically Trump is mad because the deal he personally negotiated 5 years ago wasn’t good enough. Same thing that happened with his trade agreement with Canada

        • Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Everything they do is a “net negative”! My company’s IT and HR departments don’t generate any revenue at all…

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      How did Bezos let this happen? Didn’t he buy his way into the administration for reasons?