I think he’s trying to say, “energy cannot be created or destroyed, therefore all energy is renewable”. Implying gas and oil are just as “renewable” as wind and solar.
Conservatives back gas and oil purely for personal financial incentives, and like to project that renewable energy is also only for financial incentives and not the good of the planet.
Which should only work on high school kids. In 9th grade I didn’t understand why air conditioners required power instead of generating power. Heat is energy, right? Why don’t they just take the energy out of the air and convert it to electrical energy?
I’m very confident Ben knows how the second law of thermodynamics works, and he’s taking advantage of a populace that was put through a failed education system.
I always thought of “renewable” as just used to distinguish forms of power generation that relied on processes that already occur, unlike oil and gas that exist but need to be extracted and processed to create usable energy, we have solar, wind and hydro that take adva tage of sources of energy that we simply intercept. Like a solar panel generating energy from the light that’s already hitting the spot that we installed the panel, the wind turbine that’s generating energy from the wind that’s already blowing, etc.
That may not be strictly true (im vaguely remembering secondary school geography lessons), but thats how i tend to distinguish them
It seems like ben is relying on word play to create a fallacy to confuse the meaning of renewable, which oil and gas are not.
Even if you look at it from the perspective of is a resource finite, which technically everything is, oil is going to run out an insurmountable amount of time before the wind stops blowing.
Ah yes… Conservation of Energy… which means… that we never lose energy…
I… is he trying to prove that there… is… renewable resources or is he just that dumb? Oh yeah its that.
I think he’s trying to say, “energy cannot be created or destroyed, therefore all energy is renewable”. Implying gas and oil are just as “renewable” as wind and solar.
Conservatives back gas and oil purely for personal financial incentives, and like to project that renewable energy is also only for financial incentives and not the good of the planet.
Which should only work on high school kids. In 9th grade I didn’t understand why air conditioners required power instead of generating power. Heat is energy, right? Why don’t they just take the energy out of the air and convert it to electrical energy?
I’m very confident Ben knows how the second law of thermodynamics works, and he’s taking advantage of a populace that was put through a failed education system.
I always thought of “renewable” as just used to distinguish forms of power generation that relied on processes that already occur, unlike oil and gas that exist but need to be extracted and processed to create usable energy, we have solar, wind and hydro that take adva tage of sources of energy that we simply intercept. Like a solar panel generating energy from the light that’s already hitting the spot that we installed the panel, the wind turbine that’s generating energy from the wind that’s already blowing, etc.
That may not be strictly true (im vaguely remembering secondary school geography lessons), but thats how i tend to distinguish them
It seems like ben is relying on word play to create a fallacy to confuse the meaning of renewable, which oil and gas are not.
Even if you look at it from the perspective of is a resource finite, which technically everything is, oil is going to run out an insurmountable amount of time before the wind stops blowing.