Hello! I’ve been searching for a reddit alternative, and yes, I’ve picked Lemmy and Raddle, but here’s the thing. My morbid curiosity is perked up, and a part of me wants to join the “free speech” alternatives, like Saidit, Poal, etc. What’s wrong with me that I want to join toxic places? I mean, yes I’ll find a whole new perspective (albeit wrong), on political topics, but a part of me wants to be the antagonist, and post lefty memes, and music with a left-leaning message (bands from r/rabm) I know that’s like kicking the hornet’s nest, so you don’t need to start in with “that’s a bad idea” I know it is. My main point/question is, is it wrong to join a site with potential hate speech? Does it make someone a bad person?

    • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Why? Shouldn’t the measure of good and bad be with respect to how correct it is, not how closely the position aligns with the status quo?

      • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        The word implies an unhealthy and incorrect degree. Otherwise you’re not radicalized, just representing an opinion.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          the word radical means “from or going to a root or source.”

          it simply implies wanting to deal with the root cause of issues. the word you are looking for is probably “extremism”

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          radical means arising from or going for the root.

          it implies fixing things at the perceived root cause, the word you are actually looking for here is probably “extremism”

        • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not necessarily, it implies conviction and separation from the norm.

      • Urist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yes, hence they reveal that they think the staus quo is the correct way of doing things… Though to be fair, being a little reactionary is hard wired in human brains and is especially prone to surface for those politically illiterate (or idiots in Greek).

      • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        To be fair I think my definition of radicalize is wrong given the other comments. Ive always used it as a synonym for extremism.

      • stoy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        There are a few instances like that, not just one

        • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I want so bad for them to add auto-hiding for comments from certain instances.

          • stoy
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I have blocked the most annoying instances, I used to just keep blocking all communities from them that I saw in my feed, but that list quickly became too long to even open in my app…