Chinese police hunting international corruption targets were allowed into Australia by the federal police and subsequently escorted a woman back to China for trial, in a major breach of Chinese-Australian police protocols.

The revelations, contained in Monday night’s Four Corners program about a former Chinese spy, prompted a sharp rebuke from federal politicians who are concerned the act may have undermined Australia’s national security.

The Chinese police were permitted to enter Australia in 2019 to talk with a 59-year-old Chinese-born Australian resident.

The woman was targeted under a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) anti-corruption drive called Operation Fox Hunt, which relies on police from the Ministry of Public Security (MPS) to make arrests.

Her case is one of 283 cases documented by an international NGO, Safeguard Defenders, in its recent report, Chasing Fox Hunt.

While Fox Hunt is described by the CCP as targeting “economic criminals”, human rights groups have said it is also used to silence dissidents and abduct people around the world.

  • quindraco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Woa, buddy.

    Among the myriad ways to tell that there is no world government… if there was a single world government, money would be irrelevant to situations like this - there would be no issue to smooth over because no-one’s sovereignty would have been violated.

      • Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s far from the truth to assume there’s one cohesive government entity that collaborates and communicates well enough to do something like this, and to assume not a single person associated has decided to be a whistle blower.

        Edit: a word

        • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          32
          ·
          2 months ago

          Not the same commenter but still, nevertheless, interested in the convo ofc

          It may not be an explicit government, but that’s why I specifically said in my retort “the world runs on money”.

            • RogueBanana
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              They are talking about you. Their first reply was to someone else but the second was for you.

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  And yet extremely easy to understand especially when you’re the one who butted in randomly

                  • stephen01king
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    1 month ago

                    Is joining a comment section considered butting in randomly? What is the point of Lemmy if joining a comment thread is viewed negatively?

            • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              23
              ·
              2 months ago

              … so either you’re on alts or have such a lack of self awareness that you don’t even recognize what you did.

              Either way I think we’re done here lol

          • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            the level of reading comprehension, the number of assumptions kids make these days - its fucking horrifying, innit

            • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              Not at all, some concepts are harder for some. Some grow up in environments that make learning ugly, alienating, etc. I do want to ask - would you catch flies better with vinegar or with honey? Or are you more interested in squashing?