• Juniper (she/her) 🫐@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Dark Arc is saying that it is generally considered a bad thing, contrary to the comic which is implying that it is generally considered good or neutral when it should be considered bad.

    • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      you guys missed the point. neither should be bad. it’s only bad because of how we sexualize eveything. it’s the sexualization that’s bad, and honestly, that wouldn’t even be that bad if it weren’t for the patriarchal exploitation of sex.

      • Zoot@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Shouldn’t both be bad? Stop sharing naked photos of people who can’t give you consent to do so.

        • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          there is nothing inherently wrong with our naked bodies. society has conditioned us to have shame. once upon a time, being naked was normal.

          • Zoot@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah I’d still rather people not show off photos of me without them asking. Its okay to have privacy.

            • jaybone@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              19
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              5 months ago

              This has now gone to: sharing baby pictures is a privacy violation because the baby can’t give consent.

              Lot of very special people in this thread on Lemmy today.

              • [email protected]@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                I haven’t been able to peg Lemmy down even after a year and this thread hasn’t helped. Lemmy is pro-freedom, acceptance, and FOSS, is literal to the point of absurdity, has a selectively activated superiority complex, and averages ~17 years old. Knowing all of that, I’m still endlessly befuddled. Any chance you’ve got the last puzzle piece?

              • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                sharing naked with their genitals exposed baby pictures is a privacy violation

                Lot of very special people in this thread on Lemmy today.

                Yes, yes there are.

            • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yeah, i mean in today’s world, i value privacy too, but don’t you wish you lived in a world where we were more in tune with the natural world and our natural selves?

              • jaybone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                I’m betting this same person you are arguing with is a vocal atheist who doesn’t realize religion is what imposed this shame upon our natural form, and probably that taboo contributes to the sexualization.

                • Zoot@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Id be quite curious if you’re a nudist. If you’re fine and happy to run amok without clothes on, have at it!

                  Dont be an ass. Don’t share naked photos of people. Its really not that difficult of a concept to have.

                • fukurthumz420@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  i’m an atheist and i realize that.

                  i agree with some other folks on here. i think there are a lot of children who haven’t thought this stuff all the way through yet.

          • x4740N@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            STOP SHARING NAKED IMAGES OF PEOPLE WHO CANNOT CONSENT

            IT IS THEIR BODY, NOT THEIR PARENTS AND NOT YOURS

            WHY IS CONSENT SO HARD FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND

        • JasonDJ
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Stop sharing any photos of people who don’t give consent, whether they can or not.

          In an alternate timeline where we never had the stigma around nudity, I’d be just as embarrassed of my nose in a photo than I would of my penis.

          Or maybe 10 years after I cut ties with you because you became a massive douche sandwich, I don’t want my picture on the same Facebook wall as your white pride rally.

          Not you, personally, but any body really.

      • Juniper (she/her) 🫐@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Hmm, that’s a good point, I was just clarifying what Dark Arc said as far as I can tell. You’re right neither should be sexualized, but in the world we live in neither should be shared IMO.

      • x4740N@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Still shouldn’t be sharing naked pictures of people without consent and of people who cannot consent

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        neither should be bad.

        Yes, they both should be bad. Don’t show people photos of naked children.

    • jaybone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think krippix’ point (as well as the comic’s point) is that the first is socially acceptable while the second is not. And that then suggests that the first scenario should also not be socially acceptable.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        And that then suggests that the first scenario should also not be socially acceptable.

        Last part depends on interpretation. But most likely yes.

      • x4740N@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I agree with this interpretation

        Don’t take pictures of your child naked people