I feel like this is a smart move by Donald because we’re still in this fugue state where we’re almost certain Kamala is the nominee but we’re not even sure, and the DNC is literally 3 weeks away with the actual election fast approaching lmao. Nobody has seen Kamala on the campaign trail, people barely know her and the debate would be giving her added publicity.

On the other hand it might be a good thing for her, noone knows her so she’s just some generic Dem candidate vs bigbad baby that you can just VoteBlue for

  • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    2 months ago

    The weirdest thing about Kamala is that in the context of like, cross examining (see her in Senate hearings for examples of this) she’s pretty competent, she stays on topic, she sounds normal and good at her job. When she’s talking off the cuff she sounds like a crazy person. I remember her dunking on Biden pretty hard in the 2020 debates, so maybe she would be able to bring that kind of cross-examining lawyer vibe to a Trump debate. She could also just lose the plot entirely and laugh awkwardly while avoiding direct questions.

  • ScrubsFloorsInHyrule [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Rant time. Every time I turn on npr I want to smash my head through the windshield. Listening to that station is self harm. People were calling in to talk about how they were excited about the kamala pick and haven’t been this energized since Obama. Apparently it’s so ironic that she would be able to beat Trump after him bragging about grabbing women. Apparently Biden is strong, wise, and looking out for the nation for knowing when to step down.

    No talk about continuing business as usual in Gaza. No talk about her policies as a prosecutor. No talk of improving material conditions. Pure liberal idealism. Don’t look at a single thing she’s doing or even said she’ll do. Absolutely manifesting good vibes only.

  • the_post_of_tom_joad [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Man, it’s so depressing over in the lib verse… Top comments are All about how they need to steel themselves against the Harris negativity sure to come, that all negativity is astroturf, to have faith and vote the fascism away!

    I just can’t, my peeps

    • hypercracker [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      They have a brief window where leftists haven’t consolidated critiques of their chosen one so they’re trying to spend that time inoculating people. I saw someone on mastodon try to be all “watch out for the VP critique - it’s the next thing people are going to try to use to justify not voting for her” just nakedly trying to get out ahead of a Josh Shapiro pick.

  • Owl [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s probably a strategic maneuver, but I hope it’s actually because he’s taking a turn for the worse, and the republicans are also going to have to awkwardly shuffle him off for some random candidate. It would be so funny.

    • roux [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 months ago

      Libs are so braindead. I helped a bit with a candidate running against Ronny Jackson in TX and was following Jackson’s Twitter feed religiously. So many people told him they were voting for Beto instead. Beto was running against Abbott.

  • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 months ago

    If Kamala/staff had any sense, they could just keep talking about how scared Trump is to debate her. Fill up the news cycles with Trump losing his shit and her just laughing at his Freedom Social posts. She’d be able to blunt a bit of the negative press for being a younger pro-genocide candidate.

  • geese_feces [comrade/them, love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    rfk is polling high enough and is on the ballot in enough states now that he meets the eligibility criteria for the next debate

    kamala should announce that she’ll debate rfk if trump doesn’t show up, i bet trump would change his mind and join in then

    • Roonerino [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think it would have been pretty boring. Trump would have continued being Trump, Kamala would give generic calculated speeches about freedom and democracy, fans of each team would insist their candidate scored an epic win, etc. Like 2016 but without the novelty.

      • SSJMarx@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        In terms of rhetoric I agree it would be lame, but I think the visual of Kamala standing next to Trump would be a pretty significant yardstick for people to see how far Trump has fallen off compared to 2016.

  • Torenico [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    the only positive thing about presidential debates is that both war criminals are in the same place and one minecraft TNT block should do

    • Speaker [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Fake gamer detected! The blast radius of a TNT block would never vaporize both candidates! Now let me show you the 40000 block redstone contraption I’ve constructed that will, given time, slowly push a block of cobblestone into each candidate’s hitbox and trigger a glitch causing a small amount of fall damage. In 5 or 6 hours, they’re cooked, bay-bee!