cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19944734

KANSAS CITY, Mo. (KCTV) - A sight previously thought to be science fiction is very real at a southeast Kansas City shopping center. Instead of a police officer, a security robot has been patrolling sidewalks and shoppers are taking notice.

Since Marshall the robot has been on the job, shoppers say the experiences have completely changed when they come to these stores. The robot can spend 23 hours a day monitoring the parking lot from all angles which gives people a new sense of protection and ease they don’t always have when out.

Marshall took over security at Brywood Centre in April. Before that, Karen White noticed a lot of trouble outside the shopping center.

“Sometimes it’d be concerning for your car like someone could take it or something,” White said.

Knowing now that Marshall is always watching, the risk of crime does not worry her or others as much.

“It made it very better, like you can’t be in the parking lot without seeing the robot,” White continued. “So, I think it scared them off.”

  • Mwa@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Imagine it had guns and tasers its gonna end horribly

  • lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    18 hours ago

    He has a license plate reader, he has facial recognition, he can read IP addresses from your cell phone or watch,”

    Uhhhh… How is it reading the ip addresses of people’s phones?

    • icedterminal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Someone made a mistake here. It’s not getting your IP address. An IP address is assigned by the gateway when you’re connected to an access point. An IP address is not an identity. They are always changing and can be shared. This has already been tested and upheld in court.

      It’s actually collecting your MAC address. Which is exchanged when your phone or tablet scan nearby WiFi points or Bluetooth devices. However, this can already be defeated. By default iOS and Android both have the option to randomise the MAC address in intervals. Making it extremely difficult to prove anything. This feature exists because the devices real MAC address never changes. It is unique. Alternatively, users can disable WiFi and Bluetooth scanning entirely. However, your device no longer participates in the Find My Devices program by Apple and Google, location does take longer to acquire in some scenarios, and accuracy may take longer to triangulate.

      • Westcoastdg@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Counter-argument, this is all correct, but when the application is against shopping mall criminals it will work well enough. Not talking masterminds here

    • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      I imagine it MITM’s the wifi? Obviously wouldn’t work with cellular but thats the only this claim can ve even remotely true.

      That being said they could do some shit with malicious bluetooth/NFC behaviour

  • 7bicycles [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    All I’m getting out of this is further proof that the “general publics” sense of safety exists entirely removed from anything fact based

    • InputZero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah all I see is an expensive CCTV system with high ongoing costs. Seriously it can be overpowered by a trash bag. It’s entirely security theatre.

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure privacy goes out the window when you commit a crime. If it isn’t robots it would be humans arresting you.

      Don’t support criminals in any form as they are the ones who are actively creating a need to stop crime.

      • swim@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The bootlicking version of “why do you need privacy if you have nothing to hide?”

  • Iheartcheese@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    One of these hit my car. It was out patrolling randomly in a parking lot and I pulled up to get a better look at it. I stopped like 6 ft in front of it but it just kept on coming and ran into my fucking car.

  • njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    First of all if you’re too scared to go into a store because you think your car is going to be robbed You’re probably too scared to live in public. However from the description it sounds like this thing’s just a tall camera? It can’t do anything except monitor? So how is this any better than those towers with cameras on them?

    • jeffhykin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Psychology. Ever see ring doorbell footage where the owner says “drop the package” and people do? Its not like the owner could do anything, but for some reason it makes people behave differently.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      On the one hand, yes, on the other hand, it’s unlikely to brutalize or kill people for minor offenses, so maybe a win for a public space?

      • EherNicht@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t know about you but I don’t like to be watched by big brother all the time.

          • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            24 hours ago

            maybe no legal expectation, however I ask you when were you or any other common person asked about legal expectations. don’t come with “everyone at election”, because everyone knows its not true, in any sense

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              20 hours ago

              Dude, we’re on the same side in this, I just know what some battles have already been lost.

              • ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                i understand, and sorry if I offended you. my problem was you were referring to a legal expectation as if that should be everyone’s personal expectation

      • nocturne@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Unlikely, but there is still a chance. It could always call its pig cousins to brutalize or kill you on its behalf.