Marques Brownlee, known as MKBHD, faced backlash over his new wallpaper app, Panels, due to its high subscription cost ($49.99/year) and concerns over excessive data permissions.

Brownlee acknowledged user feedback, promising to adjust ad frequency for free users and address privacy concerns, clarifying that the app’s data disclosures were broader than intended.

The app, which offers curated wallpapers and shares profits with artists, aims to improve over time, despite criticisms of its design and monetization approach.

    • Strykker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      It sounds like it’s a way to get high quality original art / photos for use as backgrounds and support the people making them too.

  • WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    40 minutes ago

    Marques Brownlee: “Don’t pay for what something will be, pay for what it is now” and “I don’t review what will be, but what a product is now”

    Also Marques Brownlee: “Pay the subscription fee now for the unnamed unspecified features this will have other than just wallpapers now to fund future development”

    Who knew the next company he would “kill” would be his own. The only way to find his app on Android is to use the link from his site because of the generic name.

    BTW Wallpaper Engine, which has an android app, is currently $5 Canadian, and I am told with Proton can also work on Linux PC’s and has an huge amount of modifiable wallpapers.

  • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Paying for ANY wallpaper is just silly, much less a subscription model.

    The only time you should pay for one if it’s an artist you want to actively support and/or thank for that specific work.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      For the last 30 years, they’ve been trying to charge for dumb shit like wallpapers, screen savers, mouse cursors.

      Who are these people who buy them? And what’s wrong with you?

  • Sensitivezombie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Paying for wallpapers is just not justifiable to me, especially when there are so many sources that offer high quality wallpapers for free, from apps to dedicated forums to simply online search.

    • tacosplease@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s cool for people with lots of extra cash I guess. I like that 50% of profits go to the artists.

      That said, I am certainly not one of those people with extra money to spend on wallpapers. Seems like we’re not the target demographic.

      Maybe that’s part of this guy’s problem here. His channel has a broader appeal than the app, so the people outside the app’s target demographic got irritated.

  • Sensitivezombie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Yeah, you last part us on point. This is for smaller demographic while the subscribers of his YT channel is more average tech enthusiasts.

  • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Wow I had no idea the subscription was that much. He mentioned it in a video without saying the price and I still wouldn’t do it.

  • vxx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Wallpapers on phone are useless because apps are always full screen.

    Who would pay for such thing?

  • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    No sane individual is going to pay for a subscription for phone backgrounds.

    That is absolutely a stupid business idea and the people who came up with it should be publicly shamed.

    • SagXD@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You think it’s new? It’s have already done by so many people in Android community. Like Widepaper, Wallfever, Wallbyte etc. These all apps are paid. People actually pay for Wallpapers.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I think buying an app for a couple of quid that has a good curated collection of wallpapers, a nice UX, etc. is a completely fair price to pay for the convenience. I like supporting devs. I fail to see the stupidity.

        A $12 monthly subscription is an entirely different beast, though.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Or even a market that let you just buy individual wallpapers as you want them, like how you used to be able to buy individual tracks in itunes instead of a whole album.

          A subscription model is a bit silly.

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Remember when people paid for ringtones? Doesn’t mean it isn’t stupid, especially as a subscription, but people do stupid things and other people take advantage.

      • atrielienz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        And Ringback tones too. For when people called you, so they could listen to your favorite song instead of the ring of the phone while waiting for you to pick up.

        • spongebue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I forgot about that! And most songs sound like ass when you hear it over a phone, especially before whatever they did in the last decade to make voice calls more clear

  • Mojave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Homie spreads apple propaganda like aids, he’s an awful tech influencer

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      MKBD covers all major manufacturers at this point. Unless you want him to say that Apple sucks, don’t see what the complaint is?

    • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      What? He’s in the pocket of all the major OEMs. He’s had zero credibility for years because of this, but he’s never been more deferential to Apple than he has been to Samsung or Google.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      He is quite harsh on Apple for someone who gets exclusive access. In this video he is talking about how nothing has changed, barely considered an update and that the new things dont even come with the phone.