A rare reversal on a company’s forced arbitration clause.

  • NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Another common W for Steam, but in all seriousness, arbitration clauses in consumer contracts need to be banned.

  • stinerman [Ohio]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s because there’s effectively a class-action suit going on right now, but because the user agreement says you have to use arbitration, there were tens of thousands of people who are like “sure let’s go to arbitration”. Valve is losing tons of money having to fight all the suits.

    https://www.classaction.org/steam-antitrust-refund-2023

    Note: I am one of the people involved in this suit.

      • stinerman [Ohio]@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’m not a lawyer so I have no clue about the legal issues, but I’m more than happy to put my name to anything that costs a corporation money. I don’t even need the money. They can take it out of Valve’s pocket and burn it for all I care.

      • Joeffect@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Right, like the fuck you complaining about? You didn’t get your game at 60 percent off? You paid for the limited edition bonus starter pack?

        Like I can see if your in another country and the company who puts it up for sale doesn’t price it for the region but is that steams fault?

        Also 30 Percent is low for some of these companies or right on target for most