Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last weekā€™s thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

  • nightsky@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    Ā·
    7 days ago

    So, today MS publishes this blog post about something with AI. It starts with ā€œWeā€™re living through a technological paradigm shift.ā€ā€¦ and right there I didnā€™t bother reading the rest of it because I donā€™t want to expose my brain to it further.

    But what I found funny is that also today, thereā€™s this news: https://www.theverge.com/2024/10/1/24259369/microsoft-hololens-2-discontinuation-support

    So Hololens is discontinuedā€¦ you knowā€¦ ARā€¦ the last supposedly big paradigm shift that was supposedly going to change everything.

    • Sailor Sega Saturn@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      Ā·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Dear heavens the hype is off the chart in this blog post. Must resist sneering at every single sentence.

      It is perhaps the greatest amplifier of human well-being in history, one of the most effective ways to create tangible and lasting benefits for billions of people.

      Chatbots: better for human civilization than agriculture!

      With your permission, Copilot will ultimately be able to act on your behalf, smoothing lifeā€™s complexities and giving you more time to focus on what matters to you. [ā€¦], while supporting our uniqueness and endlessly complex humanity.

      (Sorry this ended up as a vague braindump)

      Itā€™s interesting that someone thought ā€œsmoothing lifeā€™s complexitiesā€ is a good thing to advertise wrt. chatbots. One of the threads of criticism is that they smear out language and art until all the joy is lost to statistical noise. Like if someone writes me a letter and I have Bingbot summarize it to me I am losing that human connection.

      Apparently Bingbot is supposed to smooth out lifeā€™s complexities without smoothing out peopleā€™s complexities, but itā€™s not clear to me how I can rely on a computer as a Husbando to do all my chores and work for me without losing something in the process (and thatā€™s if it actually worked, which it doesnā€™t).

      Iā€™ve felt some vague similar thoughts towards non-AI computing. Life was different before the internet and computers and computers making management decisions was ubiquitous, and life was better in a lot of ways. On the whole itā€™s hard for me to say if computers were a net benefit or not, but itā€™s a shame we couldnā€™t as a society take all the good and ignore all the bad (I know this is a bit idealistic of me).

      Similarly whatever results from chatbots may change society, and unfortunately all the people in charge are doing their darndest to make it change society for the worse instead of the better.

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        Ā·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        re: how can a chatbot help with life?

        This just their brains on science fiction, they think chatbot can help like the independent AI agents could in the science fiction they half remember. Or at least they think marketing it like that will appeal to people.

        A lot less, ā€˜Copilot make this list of bullet points into an emailā€™ and more ā€˜Copilot, lock on to the intruder, close the bulkheads after them and flush it to the nearest trash compactorā€™.

        I think that ā€˜giving microsoft the power to do things in my behalfā€™ is quite an iffy decision to make, but that is just me. Ow look it autorenewed your licenses for you, and bought a subscription Copaint, it even got you a deal not 240 dollars per year, but 120, a steal!

        E: I saw this image and because cursed eyeballs is the gift that keeps on giving, I will link it to yall as well, nsfw warning. This is the AI future microsoft wants

        • gerikson@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          Ā·
          6 days ago

          I am neutral on MSFT - to me itā€™s a bog standard transnational company with better than most working conditions because itā€™s not making stuff you can make in sweatshops. But itā€™s really impressive how theyā€™ve gone from the beige-box tyranny of Appleā€™s 1984 ad, via the ā€œHalloween Papersā€ era where they were every Linux weenieā€™s biggest boogeyman, to todayā€™s bland backer of OpenAI. Note that theyā€™re not really advertising it. How many people who are horrified by Copilotā€™s Recall feature also know theyā€™re the biggest investor in the company that makes ChatGPT?

          From a corporate governance perspective, being so central to the tech industry for so long is kinda impressive.

          • istewart@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            Ā·
            6 days ago

            Despite the industryā€™s deeply ingrained neophilia, I think it speaks to the importance of backwards compatibility and legacy systems.

            I canā€™t help but think that the genAI craze will end up being a regrettable side-quest along the path to ā€œcoding for non-programmersā€ akin to Visual Basic. But hey, I bet thereā€™s a lot more legacy VB apps being kept alive out there than anyone would be comfortable with.

            • gerikson@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              Ā·
              6 days ago

              Despite having been one of those Linux weenies back in the day I have a lot of respect for the amount of work MS puts into backwards compatibility, dev tool upkeep, etc. And now theyā€™re actually Open Source! Hell hath frozen over (or they realized no universities wanted to pay Visual Studio licenses and lost a couple of generations of coders to Linux)

              • bitofhope@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                Ā·
                5 days ago

                And now theyā€™re actually Open Source!

                Eh, kind of but also not. VS Code is proprietary, but you have the vscode:vscodium::chrome:chromium thing. Unlike in Chromiumā€™s case, the proprietary version actually comes with some amenities one might actually care about (mainly in the plugin repository).

                You could say Open Source got some big wins in 2010s, leading to MSFT doing their fair share of contributions to Free software and openwashing as much of the rest as they can manage, but letā€™s not kid ourselves. They wouldnā€™t need to openwash if most of their stuff werenā€™t still proprietary. Last I checked MSVC, SQL Server, Azure, Copilot, IIS, Power BI, and the DirectX SDKs were all totally closed and jealously guarded.