Summary

President Joe Biden highlighted his administration’s economic record, citing consistent job growth and a 2.7% inflation rate drop from its 2022 peak.

December’s jobs report showed 256,000 new jobs and declining unemployment, signaling steady economic growth.

However, inflation remains above the Federal Reserve’s 2% target, and interest rates remain high, impacting homebuyers and businesses.

Public pessimism lingers on affordability as Biden passes a largely strong economy to his successor, Donald Trump.

  • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    18 hours ago

    According to traditional economic indicators, that’s a true statement. There is an issue with traditional economic indicators however.

  • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s weird. I could have bought a house in 2014 but I can’t afford it now despite making way more money.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    What good is that when we couldn’t sentence the clown coming into office that is going to dismantle whatever gains we might make.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    When the media or politicians report on ‘the economy’ they mean wealthy people’s money in investment capital and financial instrument earnings, not wages or savings for the working class.

  • aceshigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fuck the economy when garland let trump go. That’s biden’s fault. I will always remember Biden for that.

  • Omgboom
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Doesn’t matter, when Trump wrecks the economy he will say that he inherited the worst economy ever from Biden.

    • TechAnon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Someone should build a site that tracks all these metrics and promises from now on.

      We’re all getting cheaper gas, electricity, and groceries right? RIGHT?!

  • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    161
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    That’s what happens when the economic wellbeing of a country is based upon numbers on computers instead of the actual wellbeing of its population. Fuck neoliberalism.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I dont see how we can’t actually quantify economic wellbeing, but I dont know of a unit for this.

      Like we need something that takes into account wealth disparity. If your GDP goes up 5,000% and all that wealth goes into the pocket of a few people, the unit that measures economic welfare should be very low.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          That’s an interesting idea, but bottom 1% of what?

          GDP usually looks at companies exports, not individuals. So you’re saying we should only calculate the GDP from the poorest 1% of companies? That seems like it would be wildly off.

          • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I bet there are way smarter people should figure out how such an economy would work. (Humans have had a top down approach economically since forever.) but it’s obvious our relationship with top down approaches has changed. We need to come together and save humanity, because at this rate it’s obvious our ways of thinking are destroying ourselves and the world.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          I looked at the article, but I have no idea what “0.689” means.

          What’s the unit abbreviation?

          What does a high number mean? What does a low number mean?

          • SamiA
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            3 days ago

            Im not sure about the calculations for that specific value but the Gini coefficient itself is an index between 0 and 1 where 0 is no inequality and 1 is maximum inequality.

            The index in the link I provided is also between 0 and 1 where the value for one country is only comparable to that of other countries. The higher the number the better but again not sure what the exact components are as it was just an example of quanitifying inequality.

            • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              Yeah, thats not an alternative to GDP then.

              Like, if everyone in the country earns $1 per day and the cost of living is $2 per day, the gini is good but the economy is still shit

              We need some unit that actually measures if an economy is doing well

              • SamiA
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                2 days ago

                I imagine this measurement is probably adjusted for PPP (purchase power parity). Going from comparing the GDP per capita to a PPP and Gini adjusted GDP per capita (like what that index likely does) should be what you’re getting at. Otherwise, there’s HDI (human development index) also mentioned in the wiki that goes beyond monetary value.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Is that a quantitative value for measuring the whole.economy’s success, or does it only measure income inequality?

      • brlemworld@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 days ago

        Average savings rate, average credit card debt, number of homeowners, college enrollment rates, average net worth. Lots of measures that the news and politicians ignore.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Averages wouldn’t work. We need some unit that returns a low number if most of the wealth is in a small number of people’s pockets.

          Consider a world where one country has 99% of the world’s wealth, and 99% of that wealth inside that country is held by 1 person, with everyone else literally struggling to feed themselves.

          An average net worth for the country would show the country as having a very good economy. But, in fact, the economy is terrible. Because it benefits only one person. That’s a failed economy.

  • djsoren19@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s also a part of this that could, if you were naive, be solved with time. My job gave me a solid raise last year, 4.9%. Assuming four years of Harris status quo could get inflation down to ~2.5%, and assuming I can maintain similar raises each year, I’d likely recover from the pandemic within the next four years. Inflation is a necessary evil, but when managed over time, it isn’t a big issue. Should work for everyone right, stupid Trumpies just don’t understand long-term economics!

    Except it ignores that corporations are colluding in duopolies across many industries to steadily raise their prices above inflation to maintain profit growth. It ignores that landlords are treating maximum rent hikes as the expectation rather than the exception. It ignores that climate change is globally impacting our supply lines for food.

    Inflation being healthy doesn’t mean a damn thing when unchecked capitalism is left rampant. The Biden administration, to their credit, did weakly try to fight corporate interests. However, they did nothing to fight the fully captured Supreme Court, which made Biden’s efforts so pitiful they resemble a controlled opposition.

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Biden did elect a very effective FTC chair. She’s done some great work breaking monopolies and monopolistic practices.

      • djsoren19@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The problem, as I alluded to, is that the Supreme Court is starting to hear the lawsuits filed in response to those policies and is striking them down as unconstitutional. It’s quite likely that things like NDAs being unenforceable will also get overturned.

        Everything Biden accomplished has either been grossly undermined, hindered, or reversed by the current corrupt Supreme Court. Completely ignoring them for his full four years, especially after Roe V Wade, was pure incompetency. Again, it gives credence to the idea of a controlled opposition. He was allowed to say and do some progressive things, but anything that stepped over the line the Supreme Court would stop. He could have packed the courts, used the big public outcry against the courts legitimacy to pack it with additional judges, and actually make a meaningful change to our country’s fate.

        Instead, Joe Biden will be remembered as a vain fool who gave the country to fascism. Nothing else he accomplished will matter, if any of it is still left.

        • Fizz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Undermined by the supreme court? What is he supposed to do about that it’s a separate branch of government.

          The only people to blame for trumps election is the people who voted for him or a 3rd party. Joe Biden will be remembered badly because the right wing were incredibly successful in getting their attacks to propagate through the pop culture.

          • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            President has the right to nominate more judges. And with control of the Senate, they could have been sworn in. He wasn’t helpless, he just chose not to use the power he had.

            • Fizz@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              He cant usurp judges with no reason other than political alignment. The bar for getting rid of a judge is extremely high and has only been done once in the history of the US in 1800s. Biden did all that he could he nominated a great judge when Stephen Breyer stepped down. The things you ask of Biden are out of the realm of possibility.

              • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Never said anything about getting rid of existing judges. Did you know there is NO RULE limiting the Supreme Court to 9 judges?

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Inflation is a necessary evil,

      Only in a capitalist system, that requires the exploitation of labor…

      • djsoren19@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        It’s required in any system that uses a fiat currency. Maybe a fiat currency is evil incarnate, but it also offers a lot of conveniences. Personally, I think I’d prefer having some number that translates my labor into spending units, and fiat currency works about as well as anything else when carefully managed.

        • ubergeek@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Personally, I think I’d prefer having some number that translates my labor into spending units

          How about non-transferable labor vouchers?

          Even in a system with fiat currency, inflation is not a requirement. Its only a requirement under a capitalist system, that demands profits rise constantly.

  • oakey66@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That’s because the economy is wholly disconnected from the real lives of working Americans. Aside from 401k, job gains could just be shifting around of people from job to job. If you are in the job market, it still feels grim. The cost of groceries, energy, housing, healthcare, schooling still remain high. And that’s what Americans really experience. A reduction in inflation doesn’t mean prices went down, it just means the increases slowed down by 2.7%. And the fact that democrats are completely incapable or unwilling to have this conversation, is why democrats continue to lose enthusiasm every time there’s an incumbent democrat election. Obama was an exception because of how skilled a politician he was and how weak the Republican opposition was at the time.

    • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      “What has the economy done for me lately?”

      Hard to think of much lately other than give me false hope about my retirement options.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    3 days ago

    I suppose I’m happy for the economy. I mean, I’m glad it’s doing better than ever, I guess, but I’ve got my own issues. Sorry if that sounds selfish, but it’s just hard for me to get too excited for the economy when I’m stressed about my own situation.

    • Don’t you know, fascism is actually great and they’ve been lying to us for years because they don’t want us to have it. Thankfully trump, the biggest fascist ever, is going to fix that for us.