• kipo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 minutes ago

    According to Google Trends, related searches like “how to delete all photos facebook,” “alternative to facebook,” “how to quit facebook,” “how to delete threads account,” and “how to delete instagram account without logging in” have become breakout searches, with popularity suddenly increasing by over 5,000% compared to previous periods.

    So that is 51 times higher than usual? Am I mathing that correctly?

    I wish stories like this wouldn’t use percentages this way, and reported hard actual numbers to compare against.

  • DocumentingReality@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I posted that article on Mastodon. So, yeah…

    I hope more people will find that these open source social media sites are much better run. As well, as a much better platform than Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, etc.

    Although, I do miss Myspace. The old platform.

    I deactivated my Twitter and Facebook accounts weeks ago. I have my friends and family “moved over” to Friendica. They seem to like it so far. I have even posted (on Friendica) a few links of other open source social sites for them to check out.

  • Ithorian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    We all know that in the end only maybe 1 or 2% max will delete their account

  • index@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    stop upvoting “news” that only ends up giving more visibility to these clowns

  • Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Will never happen. Those platforms literally push addiction. It’s why the fediverse won’t ever compete imo - there’s no dopamine hit here of likes, # of friends, send a snap right now (or whatever they are called), streaks, etc.

    • theangryseal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I get it. I left Facebook when they changed the feed like a thousand years ago and I haven’t missed it.

      My wife is definitely addicted though. She left it for a year, went back just to check in on family after a friend of hers had a baby and she didn’t know about it. She hasn’t put it down since.

      She’s a very family oriented person and everyone is on Facebook. Their family is the type to wake up first thing in the morning and start calling each other.

      Within minutes of being up, “Ok kids let’s talk to mamaw. Let’s talk to aunty. Now we’re calling great grandma!” Cousins, aunts, uncles, everybody. They’re always talking.

      My family is tight like if something goes wrong, but we don’t talk much otherwise. Sister needs help with a bill, someone’s car breaks down, blah blah blah. We can count on each other, just not to talk.

      I get why it means so much to her and why it’s been easier for me. I’ll know my cousin had a kid when I bump into her with it at the grocery store. That’s good enough for my people. :p

    • affiliate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      i agree with what you’re saying and i think we’re mostly on the same page here. i just felt it would be worth saying that, from my perspective, the point of the fediverse isn’t to compete with those websites but instead to be an alternative to them. it’s to offer a picture of what social media can be like without dark patterns, extreme surveillance, and constant enshittification. and there is a really comfort in that. it feels really nice to not have to worry about a website or app getting worse every time i use it.

      i also feel like the people on here tend to behave more thoughtfully (in general) than people on reddit and other for profit social media websites. and it wouldn’t surprise me if that was in part due to the absence of dark patterns making lemmy feel more relaxed and less high stakes. there’s also a bit of a small town feeling on this website that i kind of like too.

    • Sabata@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      People should have deleted it as soon as their parents figured out how to make an account.

    • Retreaux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It was that combined with the fact that they create shadow profiles for your unborn child when your wife is pregnant. (Found out through FB being allowed to track your browsing history even off the app). That was the final straw right after the Cambridge Analytica issue.

      • kofe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Wait what the bloody fuck? I haven’t heard anything about this. Sounds right up their alley, but what evidence is it based on?

        • ditty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 minutes ago

          I hadn’t heard of this either but here’s an article about Facebook keeping shadow profiles on non-users that references an article from 2012 where Target’s data collection determined a teen girl was pregnant before she told her dad

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Stayed with FB despite Cambridge because Portal TV.

      I’ll still maintain an account because Portal TV.

      It’s a gorgeous product done wrong by meta and in need of a cloning.

  • intensely_human@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Meta did not end fact checking.

    Meta switched to a system of community notes, which is superior at fact checking than a centralized team of fact checkers.

    • Shizrak@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      So community notes can address more instances of misinformation, that part is true.

      But if the community provides misinformation as the “note” then it can actually spread and legitimize misinformation.

      So superior is definitely the wrong word for it. Perhaps more efficient? But also more likely to reinforce echo chambers.

      Superior would be implementing community notes and then having those checked by centralized fact checkers.

  • ToastySaff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    He’s getting very Trumpy with the orange tint and pale skin around the eyes.

  • rickdg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Once these platforms are perceived as a way for people to make a living somehow, they ain’t leaving. That’s why nice places like mastodon stay niche. Without virality, people don’t see the upside for them. They want a grift they can understand.

  • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 hours ago

    that’s some glorious schadenfreude

    zuck just few hours ago: “people who talk about leaving facebook are just virtue signalling”