I’m not in the US, but it seems to me that the Republicans keep breaking norms and procedures, including politicising impeachment and ignoring illegal, immoral and plain bad conduct.

They also seem to be fine with not applying the same standard across the isle.

On the other hand, either Democrats follow new precedent, with even more devolving, or they keep the old decorum and get their asses kicked by Republican foul play.

What ways out of this spiral are there?

  • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Elite centrists have dominated the Democratic party since Clinton. They love to take a “responsible” center left position and try to grab centrists. Unions, minorities and people on the left have no recourse but to continue to vote for them because the Republicans were soo much worse.

    Trump’s super power has always been his ability to say anything it takes to get votes yet deliver very little. Because of this he can say appealing things to unions and minorities who have been disenfranchised which undermines Democrats.

    The generation of boomers who have lead the Democratic Party since Clinton is literally dying out. These next few election cycles are going to be interesting as the next generation of Xers and Millennials have a different opinion of government and are much more militant and vocal.

  • shortrounddev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Need to reorganize liberal politics from the ground up. Liberals need to justify their existence and the value of their policies at the city and state level and use that to build a national brand. Democrats in federal government seem to be totally unwilling to push their agenda in deference to political norms, but in my state they get quite a lot done when they’re in power

    • BadmanDan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I disagree. Just by going off margins of past elections the last decade. Dems tend to have more loyal voters in non presidential years.

  • bstix@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Right now, not much can done, but ideas will change over time as the people holding the old ideas eventually die from age.

    In my opinion, the current shitshow is actually a sign of old ideas dying. It’ll take time, but I don’t believe the Project 2025 will be successful. It’s happening brutally right now, but it will fail, because it’s being done with only very slim support from the population.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s an illusion. Not that many people care (which was the problem in November), but the ones who do are loud about it.

        The issue is one of education. The Republicans have been spewing non-stop misinformation, and the populace is too uneducated to understand the difference. When people actually know what’s going on and understand it, they overwhelmingly oppose conservative policies. Which is why Project 2025 wants to take a sledgehammer to public education.

        If Democrats diverted all of their advertising budget toward remedial education of the electorate, I think they’d find themselves in a much better state in 2028.

  • مهما طال الليل@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    The two parties tango. The Republicans wouldn’t be getting away with it if the Democrats weren’t beholden to the same moneyed interests.

    Did Obama prosecute any of the Bush Jr officials guilty of torture and guilty of invading Iraq over a lie? Worse Obama committed more war crimes.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      But why is there a two party tango?

      Democrats will implement some policies and laws and then see support collapse as Republicans get voted in. Then people who didn’t vote will complain that Republicans got voted in and dismantled what Democrats were able to do.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I’m still optimistic. While the severity of the current shitshow is unprecedented, the reality is we tend to bounce left and right. One side gets in power and does (or doesn’t) shit, until people get pissed off and elect the other side.

    I am more worried about the death of media and rise of streaming. Just like the rise of TV changed who could be elected and how, new media is also changing that. So far new media helps elect people with dark skills, people farther from anyone you’d want governing. It’s not pretty, it’s not good, and it’s getting worse before it gets better. Truth doesn’t matter, echo chambers matter, outrage matters.

    • HasturInYellow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      Trump absolutely matters. This isn’t your avg rightward swing of the pendulum. They have gone full mask off and are ripping the copper out of the walls. This country genuinely will not survive this presidency. 0% chance it survives intact as a democracy.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        ripping the copper out of the walls

        Damn that’s a good analogy for the current slate of grifters!

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It’s not exactly 0%. Their ineptitude is still fully on display, and that’s always been our greatest hope. But it is pretty bleak, and pinning our future on the hopes that the other side makes a mistake only makes it bleaker.

  • Zero22xx@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    11 hours ago

    As a non-American, it’s always looked to me like the Republicans manage to get their shit done whether they’re in charge or not and the Democrats are just there to assure everyone they have a choice in voting and not much else.

    The whole thing to me looks like a game of good cop / bad cop. Bad cop comes along beats the shit out you, and then good cop comes along to give you a cup of weak shit coffee as a consolation for your black eye and says something unconvincing about being unhappy with bad cop’s behaviour, before letting bad cop back in to beat the shit out of you some more.

    And for every cycle of that, bad cop achieves his goals while good cop just acts as a glorified tea lady that tries to make sure you don’t have any hard feelings about bad cop.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      it’s always looked to me like the Republicans manage to get their shit done

      This is at least partly propaganda but for sure they succeed in misleading and confusing

      The shit republicans get done tends to be

      • destroying is easier than building
      • misleading is easier than actually doing
      • “flood the zone with shit and see what sticks”
      • just claim success enough times that people believe it
    • zenitsu@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Republicans getting “shit done”? What a schizo take, unless you mean just generally fucking shit up.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Destroying shit is what they said they’d do. They did it. Therefore they got their shit done.

        The problem is that it’s far easier to destroy than build. They suck at building anything. They can’t even build walls. Governing is building. They can’t govern. So they mash the easy button and destroy instead.

        • zenitsu@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          “Destroying shit is what we’re going to do” is what the libs hear/see, the average trump voter genuinely thinks he’s actually going to make things better/fulfill his promises.

          • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Libs see the actions for what they are. Farces. Pointless. Things that have no bearing in making anyone’s situation better - unless by “better” it means pissing off the libs. BS like changing the Gulf’s name. Removing sign language from government sites. The only meaningful actions trump takes are the ones to enrich himself and his cronies, remove oversight, or remove challenges to their narrative.

    • rbesfe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      People believing that they’re the same is the kind of mindset that leads to a Trump victory. Apathy rewards extremists.

      • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Democrats refuse to undo what Republicans do. The best they deliver is upholding the current status quo for another four years.

  • ECB@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The Republicans are much better about using topics they don’t care as much about to generate support so they can achieve the ones they do.

    The Democrats tend to want to die on every hill, which is ultimately a losing strategy.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    19 hours ago

    At this point? Probably not. Not if history is any indication. We’ve blown right past all the checkpoints that would have prevented this snowball effect. Our legislative processes are almost too irreparably damaged for a healthy democracy to exist. We’ve removed too many regulations regarding money in our politics and not placed enough regulations on the focus of power on individuals and entities within our government.

    We’re probably going to go through a really dark period where the quality of life is going to decline, rights will be stripped, and a lot of vulnerable people are going to die and then, hopefully, things will get bad enough that a revolution happens. It won’t be like WW2 where more powerful forces come to our rescue. We’ll have to do it ourselves. And I don’t really have that much faith in our populace doing that. Again, it will take a really significant decline in quality of life for damn near everyone before that’s even possible. It looks like that’s where we’re headed though.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Sadly, I think you’re right.

      It’s absurd that the wealthiest people in the world are making all the decisions that effect the rest of us, especially when they’re using that control to influence the rest of us through social media.

      I think the only solution is a revolution where wealth is redistributed, probably through violence.

      Bezos and Musks assets should just be nationalised. Give them pensions of 10m a year or something in return.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The US will have a “Revolution of Dignity” moment similar to Ukraine.

    If pro-constitution side wins, trump (and leading maga leaders) will flee to russia.

    But if the maga wins, the US will remain a fascist nation for decades.

    • Anatares@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It’s not written in cosmic law that this will occur. The circumstance are certainly leaning in that direction though.

      They learned from 2020. So must any opposition evolve. But yeah, moving away from fascism is going to take some blood on both sides. Arguably better than sticking with it where only one side’s blood is shed.

      A general strike is probably the best place to start. There’s still a lot that needs to happen to get the placated middle to see the need for more aggressive means.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    We’re in ‘if you can’t beat them, join them’ mode.

    Invest every dollar you can spare, because that’s the only way to win in any of this. Both ruling parties care far more about your stock portfolio succeeding than they do about you.

    • Anatares@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      No they don’t give a shit about you they care about their stock portfolio. This is true for both parties’ leadership. Consider inside testing in the debate/house with no legitimate oversight.

      Fuck you i got mine and all.

      Investing is the only way to get ahead on an individual financial basis, but it feeds the machine. They win more from it than you.

      Our capital to bargain with is labor and civility. This is why they want to replace us with AI while blocking alternate means to survive. If AI can do it we lose leverage.

      • BastingChemina@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Sure France is smaller but it was in 1789, going to Paris at this time would take days or weeks, now in a day or two anyone with a car could move through the US.

        The communication is way easier now, it’s much easier to get organized on a large scale.

        • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          I would strongly argue that it is more difficult now.

          There is mass communication, yes, but 90% of that communication is rolled on over to the government with the exact location, search history, secrets, psychological profile, medical histoey, vices, everything at the tip of their fingers for every single dissident to exploit and blackmail them into stopping.

          In those days if a letter wasn’t signed and resistance posters were put up at odd hours, nobody would be able to track down the leader and who was doing it. Now, the surveillance state is so big, it would take a matter of hours to make a full roster of the resistance and have an “accidental” police raid on their house where they are killed “by mistake” and it is ruled a suicide.

          The entire success of revolution movements came out of anonymity and the fact that the government couldn’t snuff out the organization and break it up. Now, with technology, it is quite trivial to break anonymity anywhere on the main internet. Long lasting organization is much much harder.

          That isn’t even getting into engineered addictive media to keep people occupied and demotivates just enough to not get organized.

      • laranis
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Not as a united nation, no. I think this is the start of the dissolution of the US as a single entity. The divisions will become clear soon.

      • Brainsploosh@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Does the size matter that much? For all practical purposes both are big enough that you can’t talk to everyone. The rest is surely just communications technology, no?