Got this email from Autodesk that Fusion is increasing their annual price by a huge amount. I subbed for 1 year a couple years ago for I think $380. Then I was able to get an educational sub after that. Fusion is still the cheapest CAD software out there, not including the free stuff like FreeCAD, but still, this price increase is massive.

It should be noted that it’s still free to use for personal use minus the extra features.

  • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s one of the biggest problems of the whole 3d printing ecosystem that so many people are relying on software like fusion or tinkercad that could shut down, lose its free option, and see massive price increases on subscription software.

    I wish I could wrap my head around freecad, but we’re just not there yet and we may never be. I feel like it or something like it must be our future because until we have a full libre software chain we’re living on borrowed time.

    • LifeInOregon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve started watching a freeCAD tutorial series on YouTube. It’s a little slow going, since I don’t have a huge amount of time to dedicate to it, but it’s amazing how quickly the basics can be picked up.

    • Goodman@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve just become a CAD hobo or squater you could say. There will always be one ““free”” piece of cad software that caters to the casual 3D printer and I’ve just accepted that they will inevitably raise the price and I’ll just have to jump ship again. But, at least I get to keep all the knowledge and that is what counts.

    • rustyriffs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wish I could wrap my head around freecad, but we’re just not there yet and we may never be.

      May I ask why it is that you say this?

      • VandalFan77@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I also have this question. What is so different about the workflow between FreeCAD and other 3D CAD software? If you can do one, you can do the others.

        • Crozekiel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The learning curve is steeper mostly due to tools not having as intuitive names and ui layout.

          I dove into fusion 360 last year and was making functional and nice parts within the first couple of hours. Since moving to Linux I’ve tried freecad and while I can eventually find the tools that do the same things, it is less intuitive to get there.

          Additionally, when I run into a roadblock in fusion 360, I can usually find quick and easy explanations or tutorials for it, and just have not had the same luck with freecad. I can usually get the hurdle crossed with the tutorials but I find I have to look up the same stuff often as it doesn’t stick.

          This is all nebulous as all hell, I admit. And I can vaguely tell that it does all the same things similarly to fusion 360, but it’s just different and obscured enough that I feel useless and obtuse using it and spend more time searching for tutorials and answers than I do designing.

          I want to learn it. I want to use it. But I still find myself in fusion 360 when I need to get a part designed sooner rather than later - it took less effort and faffing around to get fusion 360 working in proton ge than getting to a stable point using freecad.

      • sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve got an IQ of 87. So far, tinkercad is basically the best 3d modelling program for me so I can make stuff by using arrow keys to move around basic shapes.

      • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Blender is not designed as a CAD software. It is for 3d modeling. So you would use Blender to make graphics for a video game, or a 3d movie.

        CAD is more for designing things to be made outside of a computer, so 3d printing, CNC or stuff like that.

        Blender doesn’t consider the object as a whole, and can leave holes that a CAD setup would handle.

        • RagingRobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can still use blender though if you know how to model in it already. Just don’t leave holes and you will be fine. I use that for a lot of 3d prints I make just because I am already comfortable with it.

          • Aux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Blender workflow is very different to a CAD workflow. It’s ok for small things, but if you need to design some complex functional parts with tight tolerances, you will waste a lot of time in Blender.

      • Sorgan71@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        blender can be used as cad software, but for any practical application, you want parametric design.