• JackOfAllTraits@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    And no, being anti police doesn’t really have any relevance to war atrocities

    I mean, look, by that logic the policeman image is just completely irelevant, pro or against, to the Russian agression on Ukraine. In other words, what’s left to us is to only presume that they support the invasion on bases of their nationality, something I think is inherently wrong, just as assuming anyone’s attitudes based on race or creed.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The studio might indeed be against the war, but it’s hard for me to get over in order to give them a chance.

      • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        They cant unborn themselves on russian soil dude, and they clearly arent supportive of authoritarian abuse of power.

        You arent the government who controls your country

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          "Our goal isn’t to create an evil image of the police, but to investigate the issue of responsibility and power,” designer Vladimir Semenets told Polygon back then. “What does it mean to be the biggest policeman in the world and what responsibilities does it impose on you? He tries to be a positive character in this story. But even we don’t know yet if he will succeed in being one.”

          • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            This is not a response to what I said, nor is it in any way a rebuttal of my point.

            Do you not understand the quote? Are you asking for me to explain it to you?

            • echo64@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              If you can find the part where they are "they clearly arent supportive of authoritarian of power. " you can point it out if you like. Be warned I might just throw that quote at you again

              • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                I think youre throwing the quote over and over cause you realized you misread it, but you cant admit you fucked up this deep in.

                So you just keep resending the quote hoping Ill also misread it, and take that as a rebuttal.

                Sadly for you I didnt get stumped by middle school lit class.

                E: like, do you understand that the quote directly contradicts your issues with the game? That if you hadnt misused it so many times in this thread, I would be showing you that quote because it backs up my point?

                • echo64@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  It’s clear that we’re not going to agree. But I’m gonna just step out of this conversation because I’m done talking to someone who acts like… this. This is like reddit.

                  Bye bye.

                  • wildginger@lemmy.myserv.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    Agreeing would imply you had an argument beyond copy pasting my own evidence.

                    And, again, talking would imply you said anything beyond c+v.

                    Read slower next time, I guess? It will save you the embarassment