3 Huge Tech Companies Endorse Bill That Could Wipe Abortion Info From the Internet.::The misleadingly-named Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) just got a boost from Silicon Valley.

  • herrcaptain@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    185
    ·
    5 months ago

    Fact: Any time a bill has a name about protecting children, it’s never actually about protecting children.

    Also, what do the big tech companies have to gain by supporting this bill? They’re typically opposed to anything that can open them up to litigation.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think big tech companies are trying to figure out which side of politics they need to kiss ass on so that they can continue unfettered growth.

      • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Don’t fool yourself, they own both sides. The only difference is that each special interest will pick a side to publicly donate to, and then funnel dark money to the other - gotta cover those bases.

        Big Tech is pro-regulation at this point, at least the regulations that make the cost of entry for new companies prohibitively expensive.

        • fidodo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          No, they don’t kiss up to parties, the parties kiss up to them. They want this so they can force users to hand over PII and let them track them to access content.

          • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Companies handle/hand over PII, not users.

            I never said anything about kissing up, I said donations/bribes.

    • streetfestival@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think the tech companies believe they’ll get good PR for a bill that purports to be about child safety. In actuality, the bill will allow them to censor anything they want on their platforms while sidestepping criticism about curtailing free speech because they can say “we’re just trying not to get sued; if you have a problem, take it up with Washington”

    • fidodo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Seems like what they would gain is forcing users to have over PII and tracking them to access a non blocked content. It’s good for their ability to make money off advertising and forcing users into closed eco systems they control, and killing competition that doesn’t require registration.

        • UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Absolutely 💯💯💯. It’s almost always followed by some fearful take about protecting ourselves from some outsider who isn’t “like us” and maybe about fucking over poor people for bonus points

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Shields them from liability, kisses the ring of the powers that be, and makes them look like they are doing something good.

    • EpicVision@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ah yes, some of the shittiest tech companies in the world teaming up with the dumbest morons in existence to enforce dumb politics and censor free information, trying to turn the open internet into a shit hole of censorship like China. Amazing!

        • Jojo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Thanks, did you know your username is a wheat product that contains gluten?

          • Koppensneller@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            5 months ago

            Thanks, did you know your username is an artist who scored the hit single “Too Little, Too Late” in 2006?

            • ohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              5 months ago

              Thanks, did you know your username is a Dutch phrase meaning “headhunter”?

              It could also be Norwegian, meaning “cup snails.”

              • BigBrainBrett2517@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                5 months ago

                Thanks. Did you know your username is an exclamation of surprise in New Zealand when someone named Bradley appears unexpectedly?

                • ohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Ha it totally IS how one would write the Kiwi pronunciation for Bradley. Didn’t even occur to me. I’m just a Brad that likes bread.

    • oDDmON@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      5 months ago

      Parasites and control freaks endorse “child safety “ bill, what could possibly go wrong?

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The biggest take away from all this is

    A handful of tech companies manage and control the majority of public information.

    A handful of politicians who are in bed with the same corporations and they are all willing to control that information for their own personal religious beliefs

  • SuperSpruce
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Serious question: If this bill passes, how will the US Internet be meaningfully different than China’s Internet, if it’s used to censor stuff the government doesn’t like?

    • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      Well… The internet was originally built on decentralized communications. We may have to transition more heavily to the darkweb, any attempts to block that would be an attack on freedom of speech.

      Humanity seems to progress/regress in waves. We’ll try to ride this out, and some of us will use ingenuity to make a taller ladder vs the govt’s taller walls. They can never keep pace.

        • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          I say dark web only in protection in transit of important/forbidden info.

          I realize that was confusing, but yeah, any decentralized system should be applicable, just needs to add protecting the data while traveling, and who is looking at it.

        • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Isps could take them down. Maybe requiring each site to state what it’s using it for and forcing requirements down. If China can do it, U.S could follow too.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          True, my it department has told me no Linux or libreoffice. One of the it guys wasn’t happy about that rule either

        • UNWILLING_PARTICIPANT@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          But microsoft is unavoidable for work.

          I’ve worked in fintech almost 10 years and don’t recall a single windows machine, let alone a single piece of necessary windows service. Even the sales and marketing people use macs at least

          Google and AWS are much harder to with without.

          E: also just to note you can personallyboycott tech you’re forced to use by work, and even comparing about the company’s ethics at work

  • streetfestival@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    5 months ago

    In the fall, Jezebel reported how a bipartisan bill ostensibly meant to protect children from harmful content online could be weaponized by Republican politicians to censor everything from LGBTQ+ content to sex ed info to abortion resources—and for all internet users, not just children.

    This is so dystopian

    • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Always assume the worst case scenario. This bill is another version of the “Patriot Act” that extends to whatever your dumbass state wants it to ban.

  • Devccoon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    5 months ago

    For whatever reason, when I hear KOSA, it conjures up SOPA and PIPA. Feels like it’s been so long since any of these came up but I guess existential-level threats to internet content and privacy never fully die~

    • umbrella@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      they will keep trying until the most egregious censorship passes

      the system is broken, rebel or your internet is done for.

  • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    5 months ago

    Kids Online Safety Shouldn’t Require Massive Online Censorship and Surveillance: 2023 Year in Review

    EFF link - they’re fighting this for us

    Link to check out the merch they have for donors. Cherish my shirt from them.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I can’t wait for porn to be blurred out crotches and boobs with little stars instead of nipples. Darn!

    It was perfect! In case you are reading this in the future next couple of years, back in 2024, you just typed a few words on the search engine and you too could witness excellent quality videos of various men and women having fun with their body parts in ways that you didn’t even think were possible, and are too weak to do if you had anyone to do them with. We are talking penises, mouths, vaginas, balls and boobs and their various combinations.

  • CaptainProton@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Nobody defended communities discussing illegal things, then nobody defended communities discussing questionable legal things, then nobody defended disfavored things like firearms channels/YouTubers, now it’s your turn.