I cringe every time I hear another guy refer to women like this

  • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I sometimes hear furries mess up and refer to women as “female humans” or something along those lines, but that’s mainly because furries usually think in “male/female” instead of “man/woman” (or at least all the ones I’ve met seem to). For an example, “Cat-woman” can be kinda ambiguous and (at least imo) sounds kinda odd since “woman” is usually exclusive to female humans. In this example, are we talking about a woman who’s obsessed with cats, a woman who is a cat (a female feline with human features), an anime cat girl (a woman with cat features), or a DC Comics character (a woman who dresses up like a cat)?

    Otherwise though, yeah. Yeah, especially, especially when someone refers to women as “females” as in “check out those females over there”. That’s creepy. Even furries would rather say something like, “check out those gals over there”, regardless of context.

    Edit: also, does this hypothetical person say “males” too, or is it “man/female”? “Man/female” is a massive red flag.

    • NekoRogue@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      As a woman who is bothered by the “females” thing, “female humans” doesn’t sound bad to me. It’s because “female” is used as an adjective here. It’s the same reason “black women” sounds fine, but “blacks” sounds bad. It’s reducing someone to their gender only, as if they’re not humans, too. It feels otherimg.

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Thanks for writing that out. I’d never quite groked why it (and similar wording) sounded wrong: reducing a person to an adjective.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah, it does bother me, but not for the same reason. It’s something I associate moderately with terf lingo. But it’s a yellow flag and not a red one

      • Dyskolos
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        And what’s the difference? A female human IS a woman and vice versa? When I’d say “you are a female” is the context absolutely obvious that you’re a human. So using the word woman instead basically says the same. A human entity whose sex is female. There is no judging, no condescending, no nothing. Just pure information.

        Never in my life have i seen it as offending. As long the person who uses these terms uses them equally for both sexes with due respect. And not like men/females etc. The analogy to “blacks” is misleading as it’s both sexes while “black woman” isn’t.

    • Godort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      but that’s mainly because furries usually think in “male/female”

      I wonder if that’s because that’s how they’re tagged on e621, or if they’re tagged that way because furries already referred to them in those terms.