• Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Damn i hate that word so much. What are they supposed to influence? They are advertiser, period. Influencer should be reserve for someone who actually contribute to the society, not some clown on tiktok/insta doing memes and jokes.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They are called “influencers” because the ghouls that work in marketing realised that they are an extremely effective tool for their ongoing psychological warfare arms race

    • OpenStars@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Worst of all is that I don’t even know how to find realistic reviews for things, like smartphones, anymore - all the reviewers seem to have become “influencers” and lie to your face like “people say that this happens, but I never saw it”. Bullsh!t you didn’t, when it happens to basically everyone:-(. (even if the phone manufacturer sent them a souped-up item that actually works, the influencer is still collaborating with them, knowing that that will happen)

      It is easy to cure ignorance, simply with knowledge, but how do we get around misinformation now, without spending the time to become personal experts on every tiny aspect of life these days?

      Late-stage capitalism sucks skibidi toilet :-(.

      • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re the third person I’ve heard mention skibidi toilet (my 9-year-old daughter and 12-year-old niece being the other two), and I absolutely refuse to educate myself on whatever the fuck that is.

        • OpenStars@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t do it, it’s not worth it, save yourself my dude! :-P

          I hadn’t heard it myself prior to like a week ago. However, now I can never go back to the blissful state of being that comes from not knowing that absolutely worthless piece of information.

          Fwiw, it is a YouTube series of videos. Beyond that… it means literally nothing, just you either have heard of it or not. I did see that it got billions of views - but how many were bots playing it to run up the subscriber stats I have no idea:-P. Also, I remember a post talking about a bunch of highly strange new young-person-jargon words having been added to the Oxford Dictionary in 2023? Which is likely not this phrase, but somehow I conflated those two thoughts and now I can’t unstick them in my mind:-P.

          In this case though, I chose to use it anyway b/c the word toilet already conveys the requisite info, and the urban dictionary article about it is also funny in relation.

          Or maybe, just maybe, the success of the phrase “skibidi toilet” is in itself proof that we are all enslaved to end-stage capitalism, where algorithms feed us what we do NOT want to see or hear, and yet what they think will make them moar profitz? :-) :-(

        • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          You should, it’s actually good, basically a perfected throwback to decade old gmod animation meme humor. The animation is simple but to the point, cleverly and clearly conveying worldbuilding details and progressing a wordless(“skibidi skibidi skibidi” doesn’t count) but coherent story across many short episodes. People assume skibidi toilet is throwaway garbage content because its target audience is children and it’s about absurdist toilet monsters but they are wrong, it is art and the person making it knows his shit.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s so strange to hear people calling themselves an influencer, like they’re bragging about their ability to psychologically manipulate people (whether to sell the shit they’re being paid to pretend to like, or just for good old power tripping)

      • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s why i hate that word so much. “I am/want to be an influencer” is such a weird phrase but it’s an acceptable phrase for a lot of them. What do you trying to influence people with? Science? Math? Arts? Creativity? But no, it’s purchasing choice.

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d say you have that backwards

      Influencer is the word companies use for people with a following, and therefore power over peoples buying decisions.

      For some reason it’s leaked and been misappropriated.

      If you actually make something of value you are whatever that thing is, AND a potential influencer of buying decisions.

    • ErinCrush@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What I really hate is when actual content creators get lumped in with that name.

  • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    My impression of the main microblogging sites has been:

    Twitter: musk fanboys, celebrities and people who can’t/won’t switch

    Threads: conservatives, alt-right, grifters and celebrities

    Truth social: conspiracy nuts, maggots, alt-right

    Mastodon/kbin: nerds, left-wingers and furries

    Bluesky: furries, left-wingers and people who liked pre-musk Twitter

  • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Completely agree. Use the nuclear option immediately to defend the fediverse from the sociopathic transnational corporation Meta.

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t say that around here. You’ll get a thousand sycophants down your throat bleating “It’S ThE uSeR’s ChOiCe!!!” and that you’re “against free speech” and “just as bad as Meta” if you want us to disconnect from them.

      I’m with you, though. Meta is evil and we should not be doing business with them in any way. Any user who wants to make the “choice” to do business with Meta can do it using one of Meta’s many own products instead.

  • OpenStars@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    But won’t somebody please think of those poor billionaires who want us to buy those things that they pay influencers to sell on Threads!? /s

    Ironically one of the top things I cherish in life is not having to watch such ads, which is why I am not on Threads/Facebook/Meta/Twitter/X or even Reddit (except one sub that won’t move here) in the first place.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Idk, man. If you look at countries currently experiencing lots of public uprisings and revolutionary organizing, they seem to be the ones with some of the least prolific digital media. Myanmar, northern India, and rural Bolivia all have terrible wifi.

      Folks in “modern” nations like South Korea and Dubai and the UK are increasingly these NEET hermits with no friends or romantic partners or sense of collective good will who just fixate on online phantasm celebrities. Occasionally, one of them pops off and tries to murder a politician. But that’s not revolutionary conduct.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Seems like it’s easier to divide people who arr using social media.

        If they don’t have social media, they might go make friends, and those friends might have the same problems, and might seek to solve them…

  • psud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Won’t it be more fun to downvote anything posted or connected by a user @threads?

  • Drinvictus@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    People say you’re posting to a void on mastodon. I put a hashtag on my post and I get dozens of interactions. On threads? Sure there are more users but they’re all following these “influencers”. No real human interaction. They’re worse than bots.

  • Calavera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, micro blogs shouldn’t really exist, neither instagram or Facebook, or tiktok… Just turn-off the internet please

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its funny that people here think they’re that much different than a threads user. They probably all use Instagram or Facebook.

    • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmy users are more akin to reddit\forums\image boards users.

      It’s not really better, it’s just significantly different.

    • Annoyed_🦀 @monyet.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Been here as long as you have been and one thing i can be certain is, if one of those influencer is here they will be drown in spit. And downvote. Mostly downvote.