Witnesses watched through a window at an Alabama prison as Kenneth Eugene Smith became the nation's first person to be put to death using nitrogen gas.
  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    802·
    10 months ago

    a backwoods facility completely failed to perform the activity correctly. they tortured this guy to death, either because they are morons, or they are evil. pick one. but it wasnt the methods fault.

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
          3·
          10 months ago

          That’s bullshit, it may be a “funny quote” but it has no correlation with reality. I fear that people think this is an actual rule of thumb applicable to the world- it isn’t.

          • El Barto@lemmy.world
            3·
            10 months ago

            My man, the world is vast. Vast. So both can apply in the context of the whole world. There are a lot of evil people, yes. But there are way, way, way, waaaaaay more stupid (read: below average) people.

            What was that quote again? Paraphrasing: “Think of the intelligence of the average person. Half of the world is dumber than him/her.”

            • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
              1·
              10 months ago

              Yes. But it’s not a rule, like Occam’s Razor is, but that one is moronic too so don’t even get me started. Funny != True (necessarily)

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      3020·
      10 months ago

      There was no way to perform the execution correctly. N2 asphyxiation makes no sense as an execution method – it will only be painless if the person didn’t realize what was about to happen or if they were cooperative. If not, it’ll mean the person will fight until death. They will be put in a situation of endlessly expanding pain until they can bear it no more.

      The idea that an execution method is humane if it would be painless for a cooperative victim, ignoring the experience that will be had be an uncooperative victim, is just… really dumb. It’s incredibly dumb.

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        3·
        10 months ago

        Dumb comment. The truth of the matter is, the person will just pass out if done properly. Is it a psychological horror? Sure. But it’s not “painful” like death by slow hanging painful.

        I’m yet to read the article, but if something went wrong, it was not the method, but the humans executing the method.

        • admiralteal@kbin.social
          14·
          10 months ago

          “I haven’t actually bothered to learn what happened, what’s going on, or made any effort to imagine the situation fully or understand what people are saying, but I think other people are dumb.”

          Go away.

          • El Barto@lemmy.world
            4·
            10 months ago

            Ok. Nice call out. Let’s read the article, then.

            Edit: Done. I stand by my comment.

      • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
        31·
        10 months ago

        There was no way to perform the execution correctly.

        Sure there is, fill an airtight prison cell with nitrogen on a random day while he’s asleep. People go out soundlessly to CO poisoning all the time like this.

        • admiralteal@kbin.social
          1·
          10 months ago

          Yep, except that has two huge flaws – first, how do you make sure he really doesn’t know its coming so isn’t inflicted with other kinds of torture like prolonged sleep deprivation (because sleep = death). Second, how do you maintain the spectacle for the onlookers that have bloodlust in their hearts, who these executions are designed to make happy?

          • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
            1·
            10 months ago

            1. A human can only make themselves stay awake for so long, maybe extend the range toa month.

            2. Tough luck, the bastard is gonna die anyway? I doubt most people who want vengeance are as bad as the death row inmates who have murdered people with their own hands, most normal people can’t handle seeing death right in front of them. I don’t see this as an actual hurdle to getting it done.

      • InvaderDJ@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        10 months ago

        My understanding is that the feeling of suffocation is only due to a build up of CO2. So filling a room (or a mask I guess in this case) should not cause that feeling. Existential dread, fear, etc are obviously not affected, but it shouldn’t feel like they’re being strangled and can’t breathe.

        You’re right though, in that obviously doing something inhumane such as killing people can’t be made humane. Its a paradox. And with our system specifically, I don’t think there is a way to do the death penalty “right” because the system isn’t just. Or even effective and logical.

        • admiralteal@kbin.social
          2·
          10 months ago

          The pain will come from the desire to not be killed, i.e., holding your breath and resisting breathing the gas.

          Just because the gas ITSELF doesn’t necessarily cause pain does not mean the METHOD isn’t going to be immensely painful. Judging the technique based on how an unknowing or cooperative victim will perform is just so dumb when it is an execution method.

          • InvaderDJ@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            10 months ago

            I saw other people say that later in the thread. Do we know if that’s why this execution caused pain?

            • admiralteal@kbin.social
              2·
              10 months ago

              I mean, we don’t even know that this execution caused pain. Pain is subject and the only guy who can comment on it is dead.

              All we know is that the guy was thrashing around and then seized on the bed over the course of the 20ish minutes from administering the gas to when he apparently went lifeless.

              But it sure sounds like it was excruciating to me.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        11·
        10 months ago

        It’s not dumb, they want them to suffer. People who come up with this shit like to pull wings off flies and legs of spiders and watch them squirm.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      32·
      10 months ago

      This murder technique is not researched enough and is obviously going off assumptions and not the truth of the matter.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      101·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, but nobody is doing anything about it until now when it’s actually the way I specifically want to die because of how painless it is.

      • Landmammals@lemmy.world
        52·
        10 months ago

        It becomes significantly more painful if you hold your breath until you pass out before inhaling the nitrogen.

        So probably don’t do that part.

        • TheOneCurly@lemmy.theonecurly.pageEnglish
          8·
          10 months ago

          It is entirely natural to want to not die. It’s pretty unfair to blame the victim (even a victim guilty of a terrible crime) for the suffering caused by a process they didn’t consent to.

          • Landmammals@lemmy.world
            51·
            10 months ago

            Hes getting executed, of course he didn’t consent to any of this.

            He’s getting killed by the state. There was no way around that. He chose to face his death in the way that caused him the most suffering.

            In the past, people have done the exact opposite. People being hanged wood have someone pull down on their legs to make the process go faster so they didn’t suffer as much. This guy did the exact opposite and inflicted several minutes of agony on himself.

        • Mango@lemmy.world
          1·
          10 months ago

          Oh yeah, I watched the episode of Veritasium about the scariest thing. That said, fighting death is kinda what living things do usually. That said, holding your breath to not suffocate is kinda the dumbest shit.

    • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
      3·
      10 months ago

      Never? All the executions that happened from the Nuremberg trials were wrong then?

      I’m personally not shedding a tear for Quisling, nor would I have shed one if Anders Breivik had shared his fate.

      • rhacer@lemmy.worldEnglish
        11·
        10 months ago

        Never.

        Emotionally I agree with you regarding Nuremberg, and Breivik, (and while I know that Quisling is synonymous with traitor I don’t actually know that but if history, so can’t agree or disagree).

        The state should not be involved in murder.

        • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
          2·
          10 months ago

          The state should not be involved in murder.

          The state exists due to its right to exercise violence and murder to impose its laws. USA exists due to the violence and killings it made to become independent, and it’s not alone in that origin story.

          The US government were involved with at least 467 murders of civilians in Iraq in 2023 alone. Almost all governments with militaries are involved with murder one way or another, putting the line at convicted criminals seems like an arbitrary ethical line to me.

          I’m against capital punishment myself, but that mostly due to the issues of cost and the court’s inability to make correct judgments 100% of the time.

  • Landmammals@lemmy.world
    395·
    10 months ago

    There’s nothing described here that is inconsistent with “he held his breath as long as possible”.

    That is the major flaw with this method of execution. The person can choose to hold their breath and be absolutely miserable for several minutes before they involuntarily breathe in the nitrogen.

  • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
    385·
    10 months ago

    Smith began to shake and writhe violently, in thrashing spasms and seizure-like movements, at about 7:58 p.m. The force of his movements caused the gurney to visibly move at least once. Smith’s arms pulled against the against the straps holding him to the gurney. He lifted his head off the gurney the gurney and then fell back.

    Fucking barbaric.

    • mommykink@lemmy.world
      461·
      10 months ago

      FWIW, this is exactly what lethal injection would look like if we didn’t load the condemned up with muscle tranquilizers. Turns out, the body doesn’t take kindly to being killed.

      • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
        112·
        10 months ago

        Yes, lethal injection is just to make the spectators feel peaceful. It’s horrible for the person receiving it.

        There is no need in the 21st century for any government to execute its citizens. It’s not the 1500s anymore. There’s no excuse, other than barbarism.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      263·
      10 months ago

      I have a feeling that they botched it if it was so violent. It’s also common for people to be given/take sleeping pills to prevent spasms.

        • admiralteal@kbin.social
          159·
          10 months ago

          Yea, it’s not that it was botched per se, it’s just that this is a terrible, torturous way to execute someone.

          N2 asphyxiation is only “peaceful” when it is an industrial accident or performed on a cooperative participant (i.e., self euthanasia) – it just makes no sense for execution because someone who doesn’t want to die is going to be tortured to death by it. Forced to fight every instinct they have to resist breathing until it hurts so bad they think they will die if they don’t breath in, except they KNOW they’ll die if they breath in so they push on.

          It’s really, really awful. It’s a really horrendous way to execute.

          • Landmammals@lemmy.world
            4·
            10 months ago

            Yeah, they need to have the person breathing regular air through the mask for a while and then randomly switch it to pure nitrogen.

            • admiralteal@kbin.social
              61·
              10 months ago

              That might just create a situation where the person goes through all this torture multiple times as they hold their breath and experience the pure agony until passing out only to wake up and have to go through it all again. It maybe seems better, but it’s still basically the same torture.

              Other than doing it TOTALLY unscheduled in the person’s sleep, I cannot imagine a way you avoid the horror of this kind of execution method. And it’s hard to even piece together a way you could practically implement unscheduled/in their sleep that wouldn’t result in the person refusing to sleep, with sleep deprivation itself being a form of torture.

              • Landmammals@lemmy.world
                31·
                10 months ago

                Every method of execution requires the person’s participation in some way.

                Once that mask is on and the nitrogen starts, you have the choice between dying in one of the least painful ways that we know of, or dying in one of the most painful ways.

                I don’t know if this guy thought that he could find another loophole and delay his execution, but all he accomplished was making his last moments on Earth miserable.

                Calling it torture is to say that he has no agency, which is obviously untrue.

                • admiralteal@kbin.social
                  2·
                  10 months ago

                  It’s definitionally coercion if the only other option is death. You do not have agency in that situation. End of story.

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            2·
            10 months ago

            Forced to fight every instinct they have to resist breathing

            That’s part of what I mean by botching it. It does require some bit of knowledge about how the body responds physiologically to various gases to prepare for it. I’m not sure if there’s a way to know for sure, but if they didn’t explain that letting him fill his lungs with N2 from the start instead of letting him accumulate CO2, his death would’ve been entirely peaceful. Also, making him fall asleep first would’ve guaranteed that he didn’t fight it. There are various ways of doing that.

            Overall I’d prefer this method over any other if I had to choose. I just have a feeling that they could’ve handled it much better than they did from lack of experience and forethought.

            • admiralteal@kbin.social
              3·
              10 months ago

              But he didn’t want to die. If you don’t want to die – if you aren’t cooperating with the execution – it is going to be torturous with this method.

              The attitude of “this is the way I want to die” is automatically assuming that you want to die. That you’re a willing participant. Execution must be presumed to have an uncooperative victim and the humaneness must be judged in that context.

              Lot of people saying he should’ve just let it happen. It would’ve hurt him less. That’s unacceptable to say to a victim of violence in any other context, so I’m not sure why it makes sense to people here.

              • Lemminary@lemmy.world
                3·
                10 months ago

                Like I said, there are many ways of making an unwilling person cooperate but there will always be someone arguing the contrary. Just because this didn’t go as expected doesn’t mean it’s a tortuous method. Some convulsing is expected but that doesn’t mean that the person was conscious.

                I’m not for the death penalty but I’m glad that more options are being explored and I hope that this is used as a learning experience.

              • El Barto@lemmy.world
                2·
                10 months ago

                If I’m going to be killed, and I know I have no choice, I will choose this method over anything else any day. Maaaaybe I’ll consider a shotgun blast in the head, or being blown into tiny pieces. But nitrogen or helium seems like the best way to go - for an unwilling but cooperative person like me.

        • El Barto@lemmy.world
          1·
          10 months ago

          Spasms for holding your breath? Uh, no?

          Give it a try while recording yourself. Don’t worry, you won’t die. Just have someone with you while doing it, for safety reasons.

  • capital@lemmy.world
    287·
    10 months ago

    What are the chances that the preferred method for assisted suicide in some countries is “cruel and unusual punishment”?

    Should we allow the state to kill people? No.

    Is this particular method the least cruel/painful? I think that’s likely.

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      21·
      10 months ago

      Is this particular method the least cruel/painful? I think that’s likely.

      This method can be the “least cruel”. The coverage on this story kind of sucks. Apparently they didn’t allow for a way for CO2 to escape this he felt the sensation of suffocating as it happened. Had they done that or just flooded the whole room with nitrogen then it would be the “least cruel” method of execution.

      I put “least cruel” in quotes because on this issue we tend to mash cruelty in with messiness even though they have nothing to do with each other. Shotgun to the upper brain stem (or something like it ) is probably the truly least cruel method. No time for suffering, consciousness just ends.

      We could also just not do capital punishment but that’s not happening so here we are.

  • ZILtoid1991@kbin.social
    112·
    10 months ago

    “Humane” execution isn’t good, not only because execution is bad, and the pretense of a more humane method is just sugar coating, but also like 95% of people in support of death penalty just want to see a human being killed, with almost all of them are angry at how it’s doesn’t involve torture. The worst of this kind legit fantasize about murdering PoC kids as bloodsport, under the pretense of “upholding the law”.

  • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    8·
    10 months ago

    At least they can just suck all the nitrogen back out of him if they find that there was a miscarriage of justice later on.

  • bleistift2@feddit.deEnglish
    126·
    10 months ago

    For fuck’s sake. Are you telling me Americans, of all people Americans, are now too stupid to kill?

    What’s with these crazy new execution methods? Just shoot the guy. It’s not like you didn’t have a hundred thousand cops trained to kill on sight.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    21·
    10 months ago

    So the guy was guilty perhaps but we have to realize that what was done was a recreation of the Nazi extermination final solution. I fear this. It didn’t work as smoothly as they planned but it sort of worked. So will that mean that we will slowly accept this as normal vs banning the practice altogether?

    • norbert@kbin.social
      15·
      10 months ago

      The man who was executed was the one who DEMANDED to be executed by nitrogen gas, it was his final wish.

      Source on this? I can’t find anything about that. I did find this.

      Smith’s 1989 conviction was overturned, but he was convicted again in 1996. The jury recommended a life sentence by 11-1, but a judge overrode that and sentenced him to death. Alabama no longer allows a judge to override a jury’s death penalty decision.

      In the wake of Smith’s failed execution, he has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder and is being prescribed a cocktail of medications including drugs to control migraines. His prison psychiatrist has recorded that he is suffering from insomnia, anxiety and depression – symptoms often associated with severe trauma.

      “I am not ready for that. Not in no kind of way. I’m just not ready, brother,” he said.

      That alone is enough for me to question the states ability to administer justice. Whoever told you he requested it is a liar and likely trying to manipulate you; or is just stupid.

      https://apnews.com/article/nitrogen-execution-death-penalty-alabama-699896815486f019f804a8afb7032900

      https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/21/kenneth-smith-alabama-execution-nitrogen-gas

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      13·
      10 months ago

      It’s funny how in another thread you talk about how you are against killing other humans and here you’re defending how the government is killing humans.

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      121·
      10 months ago

      How it looks to onlookers should in no way factor in to deciding what method you use.

      The onlookers don’t have to be there. They have a choice.

        • admiralteal@kbin.social
          2·
          10 months ago

          Just so long as you understand that your desire to end the life of imaginary people who are irredeemably bad WILL lead to the death of real people that are redeemable. Not to mention innocent people.

          Though I don’t think it is up to you to decide that any life is definitely less preferably to death. Only the ones living those lives can decide that.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        103·
        10 months ago

        this guy chose to suffer.

        He was desperately trying to cling to life. Are you saying you wouldn’t?

        • Landmammals@lemmy.world
          2·
          10 months ago

          Of course I wouldn’t! CO2 suffocation is one of the most painful ways to go out.

          As someone who is currently alive and will die someday, I’ve thought a lot about the end. If my life ends in an intentional manner, nitrogen tank and a face mask is exactly how it’s going to go.

        • deft@lemmy.wtf
          11·
          10 months ago

          Maybe don’t kill people then

          Y’all have empathy for the wrong ass people.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            1·
            10 months ago

            It’s not about empathy. It’s about not giving the state the right to control the life and death of its own citizens. Maybe you’re okay with the state having that power. Many of us aren’t, especially when innocent people have been executed.

        • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
          17·
          10 months ago

          Homie I desperately seek out death. Life clings to me.

          Also the solution is super simple and has already been brought up hundreds of times. Put them on an oxygen mask, at some point without their knowledge, swap them to nitrogen.

  • sugarfree@lemmy.worldEnglish
    431·
    10 months ago

    How did his victim feel when he murdered her? If this monster suffered for a few minutes, so be it.

    • Bluetreefrog@lemmy.worldEnglish
      182·
      10 months ago

      The number of people who have been released after decades in prison after modern forensic techniques (e.g. DNA analysis) have proven the convicted person was innocent shows why execution should never be used. Better that a guilty person spend a life in jail instead of be executed than an innocent person be executed by mistake.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        10·
        10 months ago

        This case was even better. The sentencing jury voted to give him life without parole. The state appealed that and a judge overturned the life sentence to give him a death sentence.

        Why do we even have a jury?

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      6·
      10 months ago

      So, are we to be his equal? A society that feels comfortable killing its fellow human beings painfully. Or do we aspire to be better. To not seek revenge but merely to minimize harm done.

      And does the 8th amendment matter anymore? Does it still stand? Cruelty as we execute surely must violate it.

    • SuiXi3D@kbin.social
      82·
      10 months ago

      Violence begets more violence. Every time. Killing this person does nothing to bring back the woman they killed, and just pisses off even more people.

      • admiralteal@kbin.social
        4·
        10 months ago

        For the guy you replied, to the violence isn’t a side effect, it’s the goal. The cruelty is the point.

        And in that case, why even pretend? This entire execution method was conceived as a way to be “more humane”. It wouldn’t exist if not for that objective. And if we don’t care about the cruelty, just use hanging or firing squad.

      • sugarfree@lemmy.worldEnglish
        24·
        10 months ago

        That’s your opinion. I would hazard a guess that more people support the execution of violent murderers than oppose it.