(I didn’t, largely since I’ve never watched a single episode, but the psychic damage and whiplash of Wholesome Pony Show having said this line was too fuckn much for me)

EDIT: More replies than upbears now. It’s probably an official struggle session now (although most of it is that one person). One must imagine SisyFEWs happy.

  • Crowtee_Robot [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    Apple Jack is giving Twilight Sparkle the evil eye because she just lent her her copy of “Hammer and Hoof: Ponyville Communists During the Great Depression” but doesn’t seem to have even read it or any older works by writers like Kyüti Marx.

  • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    Its utterly ahistorical and revisionist, but at least serves to try and smooth the contradiction between working-class migrants and their native peers. Its also a children’s TV show, so if you’re not getting the full dialectical history of three centuries of Western Frontier politics… eh.

    At some level, kids TV should just steer clear of this shit entirely, because you’re not going to do it justice. But of all the shows I’m going to shit on for being liberal propaganda, MLP is trending towards the bottom of the list. I wish they had just… not. But also I live in a liberal hellscape so I’m not going to cry over a relatively minor offense.

      • Wheaties [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molly_of_Denali

        Molly of Denali (stylized as MOLLY of DENALI) is an animated children’s television series produced by Atomic Cartoons in association with WGBH Kids, created by Dorothea Gillim and Kathy Waugh for PBS Kids and CBC Kids. It premiered on July 15, 2019, and is the first American nationally distributed children’s show to feature an Alaska Native as the lead character. Thirty-eight half-hours were produced for season 1, which has a 50-minute special as its season finale.A special live-action segment filmed in Alaska airs between the two 11-minute story segments.

        On April 6, 2021, it was announced that the show had been renewed for two more seasons, whose second season premiered on November 1, 2021, and ended on October 10, 2022, after 14 episodes. The third season premiered on November 7, 2022.

        glad to know PBS Kids is still green-lighting new shows

  • Llituro [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    centrism is when the inconvenient fact of the indigenous people who cared about the buffalo population aren’t even worth a mention.

    (it occurs to me the possibility that the buffalo are explicitly a stand-in for indigenous people, but please don’t try to tell me that makes it better. otherwise, i’d like to show you a picture of some random frankish warrior and tell you that both the mongols and the europeans have use of the european peninsula. lottttta different nations and peoples to be mashing together into one representative that can’t have revolutionary intent right there.)

  • LGOrcStreetSamurai [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The hatred of My Little Pony’s was the precursor to modern online fandom discourse. People’s online response to this show (good, bad, or indifferent) warped how the internet talks about fandom in a major way and online culture as whole in a lesser extent.

    • pooh [she/her, love/loves]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      People’s response to this show (good, bad, or indifferent) warped how the internet talks about fandom and online culture.

      On a positive note, though, I think it was also legitimately a gateway to questioning gender norms for a lot of people.

      • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Remember that a big chunk of the historical fandom was weirdo fascist edgelords who wanted to fuck the ponies and wrote horny violent fanfics about them. One of the longest fanfics about anything (FOE:PH) is basically “Made in Abyss but it’s ponies and set in a post apocalyptic wasteland.”

        • BeamBrain [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          FOE:PH

          Oh God, I remember hearing talk about how terrible this was and having a peek out of morbid curiosity. I made it maybe a quarter of the way through the first chapter before I had to dip out at the exhaustively described fever dream of what MRAs imagine a society run by feminists would look like.

          • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Wasn’t there also a Fallout crossover fanfic that completely missed the humor aspect that was always present in Fallout and was sort of edgy for edginess’ sake? I never read it, but its fandom was pretty scared-fash at a glance.

            • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              The most infamous of those is the one I mentioned, Fallout Equestria: Project Horizons, but the original Fallout Equestria was also pretty bad just much, much more tame than FOE:PH was.

                • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It predates it, but it is similar in tone and grotesqueness. Although thinking about the full depth of the problems with Made in Abyss that I covered exhaustively in a post last night, FOE:PH isn’t as bad. It’s a gratuitous, edgy spectacle that handles problematic themes poorly, but it’s merely making an exploitative spectacle of them while Made in Abyss is even worse. AFAIK most of the characters in Project Horizons are adults though, though I think there’s some nonce stuff in there too.

    • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The show’s sudden widespread popularity always felt like a western version of Japanese otaku culture to me. People were making their own comics, fanart, radio plays, etc. It was like doujin circles. They even would stalk the voice actresses like creeps.

      It’s always been interesting to me how closely otaku and western nerds will come to imitating one another without significant contact with the other. There’s like a platonic ideal of weird creepy nerd they’re all drawing from in the ether. They even have their own weird fascist contingents. Japan invented incels too like in the 80s.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      The hatred of My Little Pony’s was the precursor to modern online fandom discourse. People’s online response to this show (good, bad, or indifferent) warped how the internet talks about fandom in a major way and online culture as whole in a lesser extent.

      Look in this thread. The old tiresome “X is for babies” symptomatic brainworms wriggling is on display. yea

        • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it’s so inevitable that even bringing up that particular show is going to churn out a similar vibe to what happened in the early 2000s if someone so much as brought up furries. frothingfash

            • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              At the risk of setting them off again, I argue that Gambo, at its height, was like that, and unlike FiM or even R&M it had painfully mainstream saturation. It was basically impossible to exist in public anywhere with a line or a waiting room, where a TV or a magazine could be found, without “WHICH MURDERFUCKER IS ON THE IRON THRONE THIS WEEK?” so-true headlined everywhere, for years. I had to involuntarily learn a lot about that show during that time.

                • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The banker-born sexpest failson creeps that ran that show had everything going for it and still drove it into the ground with sheer fucking hubris with a side order of resentment toward Emilia Clarke because she started pushing back and didn’t want to just be their (CW: SV)

                  spoiler

                  actually-weeping-because-of-contractual-coercion SV plaything on camera anymore so they character assassinated the character then had her murderfucked as petty retaliation.

      • LGOrcStreetSamurai [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Maybe it’s rooted in weird gender coding stuff? I do find it odd the selective salty-ness of the net being weirded out by one children’s animated television show but not another. I’m not even on the “let people enjoy things” tip, but it’s just weird the show about unicorns, rainbows, and friendship gets mad hate but if it were a show about kiddos fist fighting against the forces of evil and you get a pass.

        It’s always just “You are grown, you are watching a show for girls.” It’s never any valid leftist critique one could probably make in a integrious way like the original poster talking about centrism for example.

        Personally I don’t rock with MLP. However, I dig lots of the new generations cartoons like “Adventure Time” and “Rise of the TMNT” which are “for boys” but no one bugs out about that. Which is kinda telling to me.

        As if we all didn’t go see Barbie by the way. A movie about a product “for babies”.

        • AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe it’s rooted in weird gender coding stuff?

          A lot of it is, “girly” media are constantly ridiculed and villified to an extent that hypermasculine Vin Diesel shlock never is. but ima be honest here, what put me off in regards to MLP where the fedora guys fantasizing about horse ass all day.

        • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          As if we all didn’t go see Barbie by the way.

          I think a recent version of “X IS FOR BABIES” brainworms came from people that didn’t just not see Barbie (it’s fine, no one has to watch it) but made “didn’t see Barbie” into some badge of maturity (or in some cases, performative masculinity) in contrast to Oppenheimer (it’s fine, you are allowed to watch it, or not) as, once again, MATURITY™ discourse.

  • pooh [she/her, love/loves]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I haven’t seen this episode, but could it be possible that Twilight Sparkle is simply talking about how material conditions drive historical change, rather than trying to morally justify the actions of the settlers? She is the book nerd of the group, so it would make sense that she’s read theory and is maybe attempting a Marxist analysis of settler-colonialism in Equestria.

    • KobaCumTribute [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, it’s literally just a call to stop the active conflict. That happens by letting the settlers keep all the land but giving the buffalo a stipend of food. Like it’s so absurdly egregious that there’s no soft reading of it in context.

      It also establishes the situation with the land use as a dichotomy between the settlers making productive use of the land vs the buffalo just leaving it barren and stomping around in it for fun. It does basically everything wrong, right up to its conclusion being that the buffalo stop resisting and just accept that the land isn’t theirs anymore, but they get a little bit of food thanks to the “productive” use of their land by settlers. It is basically a manifest destiny storybook narrative.

      • pooh [she/her, love/loves]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        For shits and giggles I asked ChatGPT to generate a Marxist analysis of the episode, and this was the result:

        My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic" (MLP: FiM) can be analyzed from a variety of perspectives, and using Marxist theory is certainly one way to provide a critique of its content and subtexts. “Over a Barrel” is a particularly relevant episode for this, as it deals directly with themes of colonization, land disputes, and cultural understanding.

        1. Commodification and Land Ownership: The episode starts with the ponies transporting an apple tree, Bloomberg, to a distant town. This act in itself is a symbol of commodification – transforming nature into a product. The tree becomes a symbol of Applejack’s capitalist endeavors, a means of expanding her apple business.

        2. Colonization and Native Rights: When the ponies reach the town of Appleloosa, they discover that the settler ponies are in a dispute with the buffalo over the land. The buffalo claim that the land belongs to them and that they need it for their traditional stampeding grounds. The settler ponies, on the other hand, have begun to build a settlement and apple orchards on the land. This can be viewed as a parallel to historical colonization where indigenous populations were often pushed out of their traditional lands by settlers.

        3. Cultural Hegemony: The settler ponies, representing the dominant cultural force, display a lack of understanding or respect for buffalo traditions. The ponies’ expansion and settlement could be seen as an example of Gramsci’s concept of cultural hegemony – where one group’s cultural norms and values dominate and marginalize those of other groups.

        4. Conflict and Class Struggle: The central conflict between the buffalo and the settler ponies can be interpreted as a class struggle. The buffalo represent the oppressed proletariat, whose traditional ways and means of subsistence (the stampede) are threatened by the bourgeoisie represented by the settler ponies. The settler ponies’ apple orchard, particularly Bloomberg, can be seen as means of production, which they control at the expense of the buffalo’s traditional ways.

        5. Resolution and the Status Quo: The conflict is eventually resolved through compromise. The buffalo agree to let the apple orchard stay as long as there’s a path for them to stampede. While this seems like a happy ending, from a Marxist perspective, it can be viewed as maintaining the status quo. The bourgeoisie still controls the means of production (the apple orchard) while the proletariat (buffalo) have to adjust their traditional ways to fit the needs of the dominant class.

        6. Interpersonal Relationships vs. Systemic Issues: One could critique the episode for resolving a systemic issue – colonization and land rights – through personal understanding and friendship. While interpersonal understanding and communication are important, they often don’t address the underlying systemic issues. From a Marxist standpoint, this could be seen as an oversimplification of the complexities of class struggle.

        Conclusion: “Over a Barrel” provides a narrative that touches upon complex themes of colonization, land rights, and cultural hegemony. While the episode promotes understanding and friendship as a means to resolve conflicts, from a Marxist lens, it can also be interpreted as a narrative that simplifies systemic issues and supports the status quo. The episode offers a valuable platform for discussions on historical and ongoing struggles between indigenous populations and settler communities.

    • Nagarjuna [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like that you thought it was more likely that midnight sparkle was a Marxist than it was that a TV show made to advertise toys was liberal.

    • privatized_sun [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      could it be possible that Twilight Sparkle is simply talking about how material conditions drive historical change,

      Marxists: “I love indigenous!”

      also Marxists: (shrieking about how “non-historical peoples” deserved to be genocided)