• GnastyGnuts [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I forget the exact stats on it, but gambling addiction is especially destructive to people’s lives even compared with other major addictions. Also, on a petty treat-fiend note, it has made sports so much fucking shittier.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Also, on a petty treat-fiend note, it has made sports so much fucking shittier.

      Any restrictions on the treats whatsover is wrong and bad because Prohibition and everything can be compared to Prohibition so regulations bad in general. I am very leftist. smuglord

  • Grandpa_garbagio [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This would’ve been alright if you still had to like go to an official to place bets. The problem is there’s a fucking casino in your pocket now and they’ve been given free reign to advertise to everyone on everything

    • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      nah, any bookie or house or casino needs to go. There shouldn’t be any “officials” allowed to take bets whatsoever, as this leads to gambling industry. Small scale bets between individuals is fine, but once a house is involved and taking a cut it’s crossed the line

      • Grandpa_garbagio [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        32 minutes ago

        i mean i agree, obviously gambling is inherently predatory when there’s a house.

        my thought is mostly that the concept of “legalizing sports betting” is one thing, while legalizing pocket casinos and smashing you across the head with advertising is another.

        like hell, at least if you had to go to a bookie it’s something to do, you’re getting out of the fucking house. this is just sitting on your ass and pissing your money away without even a walk outside to speak of. it’s bleak

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I didn’t expect a struggle session or treat defending in a thread about international corporate-scale fucking sports gambling.

    What is even left to be leftist about if someone is totally fine with ever-growing sports gambling conglomerates destroying the livelihoods (and even the lives) of individuals and everyone around them while performing one of the most direct poor-to-rich wealth transfers there is?

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 hours ago

        There’s a consistency at its core: “making something illegal doesn’t make it impossible, therefore nothing should be illegal, especially if it’s a treat I like.” smuglord

        • imogen_underscore [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 hours ago

          i have to say i get the urge cause I’m an alcoholic and a smoker but I recognise in a utopian view of the future those things are hopefully going away lol. it’s a knee jerk reactionary urge that ppl need to learn to recognise and fight in themselves

          • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I feel the same way.

            I have my own vices, and it would be particularly selfish of me to believe that because they’re my vices that they aren’t harmful ones and everyone should be into mine.

    • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Lmao, I just started listening to this and they immediately compare it to legalizing heroin and giving control of the heroin industry to tobacco companies, with the implication that that would obviously be incredibly bad.

      Turns out half the people in this thread think that that’s a great idea actually.

      • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Oh my God then they started talking about self-identified socialists now having a libertarian streak and thinking restrictions on people’s actions by a Nanny State are bad.

        • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Oh my God then they started talking about self-identified socialists now having a libertarian streak and thinking restrictions on people’s actions by a Nanny State are bad.

          Many such cases, including on Hexbear. Fucks’ sake, I once had an ugly prolonged knock-down drag-out posting fight with some asshole that insisted they absolutely needed their two-stroke gas powered leaf blower and gave me the full arsenal of “no veggies for dinner, no bedtimes” selfish bullshit talking points all the while.

  • sewer_rat_420 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I also saw this. I wonder how much the legal gambling also just opened up pandoras box. I think that a lot of people, especially whales, end up on offshore sites anyways because of better odds and less overall rake. And of course there are also underground sportsbooks still for the biggest players, like Shohei Ohtani’s former interpreter who got caught gambling millions of stolen money this spring.

    And also, even in CA there are “fantasy games” (tickpick, underdog, even jake paul is affiliated with one of them) and there are “social gambling” sites that use the “sweepstakes” loophole, such as fliff sportsbook and chumba casino. These ones, you pay money for a “fun currency” and you also get “sweeps cash” that is basically a premium currency on their site that can be gambled for real cash. But even the off shore sites are pretty heavily advertised on social media, such as stake and bovada.

    Regardless of the actual mechanisms of gambling that are available in your state, the prevalence of the advertising is nauseating. Draftkings/mgm/fanduel ads are all over sports stadiums. Beyond that though, some channels, especially ESPN, show tons of actual odds during their broadcast alongside an ad for their own platform, espnbet. The massive influx of gambling money is tainting sports overall.

    Im glad my favorite sports franchise has yet to take any gambling ads, but still when they have a game on ESPN i have to put up with the odds bullshit, in addition to everything else that is total garbage about that channel.

    Also, players themselves are being harassed on the field and online by people blaming them for a bet that didnt hit. Some players even received cash app requests to pay back a bet that they ruined.

    I dont think it will be banned in mosr states, but congress should have the power to at least curb the advertising specifically, because that should fall under interstate commerce.

    I live in CA, a state that still hosts a lottery, another form of expooitative gambling that should be banned or severely restricted. No need to have slot machines on paper at every gas station and convenience store.

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I think the question to ask about this is why it’s such a unique problem to america. Much like guns.

    Here in the UK 15% of men do online gambling and 4% of women. Ok so the top line of data says that 40% of people do gambling but this is only because of scratchcards at petrol stations. When you remove these it drops to 15 and 4.

    Why is this situation so significantly worse in america? What is unique about american society and culture that causes 33% of americans to be betting on sports, let alone other stuff?

    • bigbrowncommie69 [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      I wonder if it’s a case of them not really having culturally/socially adjusted to it like everyone else has. .

      That and there’s also a lot more sports going on that are insanely popular/that people are engaged with. Here it’s mostly just football and horses. There its NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB, NCAA and to a lesser extent: MLS, WNBA and NASCAR.

    • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Supreme court struck down a law banning sports gambling in 2018 on the logic that “illegal gambling is already happening, might as well make it legal and cut out the criminals!”. The now-legal betting companies started pushing a non-stop torrent of pro-gambling ads immediately.

      Australia is also pretty bad, see below:

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        “illegal gambling is already happening, might as well make it legal and cut out the criminals!”

        That SAME FUCKING TAKE is in THIS THREAD, RIGHT NOW. susie-baffled

        • barrbaric [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I think the apps originated in silicon valley, so they had tons of money behind them that was willing to make a marketing push. Ads for them were already present as early as 2015 IIRC, even when they were still technically illegal, but nobody got arrested that I know of.

    • Aradina [She/They]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Its also a major issue elsewhere. Australia for example has a pretty horrific gambling problem and the government rolled back promises to ban gambling advertising.

    • MayoPete [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      “Capitalism with American Characteristics” is a disease that is poisoning every part of society. I believe it breeds desperation and a “fuck it” attitude and drives people to reckless behavior, aggression, and distrust of others.

      I’m not immune. I kind of hate most people, especially here. Society sucks, most people suck.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I kind of hate most people, especially here. Society sucks, most people suck.

        Considering your already-stated complete apathy toward other people’s suffering because you want unmitigated and unregulated sports gambling because you enjoy it and fuck everyone else you got yours, you’re voluntarily contributing to that “society sucks” problem here.

  • bigbrowncommie69 [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Feel like making illegal doesn’t necessarily solve the problem either. Best thing to do would be banning advertising and heavily regulating apps - no notifications etc.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      51 minutes ago

      The problem doesn’t need to be 100% solved to at least be mitigated.

      There’s a material reason why Burgerland has a staggeringly higher rate of gambling addiction than countries with more regulations and restrictions, “solved” or not.

    • imogen_underscore [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      making gambling illegal is harm reduction actually. it’s not a direct equivalency with drugs. you can make moonshine in your bathtub without detection, the govt has the power to shut down corporate gambling operations and I would bet ;) that most customers won’t bother moving to the underground option. (which can also be shut down much more easily than a drug ring) it is harm reduction. I don’t know why so many people feel the need to defend its existence here.

        • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I mean banning it like it was what, only a decade ago? That’s clearly the best solution. Friendly wagers over the local game don’t cause a mass transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich, FanDuel does

          • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            According to “fuck you, got mine” misanthropic fairweather leftists in this thread, if making something illegal doesn’t make it go away 100%, it should be completely legal, which includes the massive tech corporation shit that has already made watching professional sports even worse than before and more a vehicle for gambling than for enjoying the games for their own sake.

  • egg1918 [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    7 hours ago

    And the ads are fucking everywhere. Entire train stations with every square inch of advertising space plastered with Jamie Foxx or whatever washed up scumbag piece of shit actor they could find.

  • 2Password2Remember [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    legalizing it is fine IMO, it’s probably better than black market gambling. but the ads being everywhere is terrible. advertising cigarettes on tv is illegal, should be the same for gambling

    Death to America

  • AmericaDelendaEst [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Sports should be illegal. Why? For sustainability. Athletes eat like 4x as much as a normal person. That’s a lot of fucking food. And what for? So they can run or throw a ball? Who the fuck cares the planet is dying

  • RION [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I don’t gamble and am actively repulsed by how it’s being pushed as hip and cool. That said, I’m surprised by the hardline abolition stances in here. Drugs (including alcohol) are surely far more corrosive to people’s wellbeing, but no one on here is arguing for prohibition, right?

    • Diuretic_Materialism [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The opioid epidemic has made a lot of people, myself included, skeptical of anti-prohibition. Turns out pushing something underground often does have the effect of making it more expensive and inconvenient to access. There some study I can’t find now, but it claimed legalizing prostitution actually increased human trafficking because now traffickers could mask their operations as legal sex work opening them up to new clientele they normally wouldn’t have access to. I suspect there’s a lot of men who would be going to brothels regularly if it was as easy as going to 7/11 but don’t want to go to the bad side of town to pick up a sex workers who could be a cop doing a sting.

      Same with drugs, going from a system where you had to import raw opium from Afghanistan or wherever to the west via camel and make shift submarine, then process and distribute it clandestinely, made being a heroin addict and expensive pain in the ass. Now you can buy pills made semi-legally in a factory in Mexico that some guy got prescribed to him by a shady Floridian doctor for a broken ankle he had 10 years ago.

      Prohibition didn’t work for weed and booze cuz both of those are things easy to make and distribute even when they’re illegal, plus they’re both easier to consume, and even abuse, while being a functional member do society. I think there are vices thought where you could reduce the consumption and abuse of just by making it a big fucking pain in the ass to get access to and gambling I think is one of them.

    • imogen_underscore [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      in a true utopian vision there would be little to no want for any of these things. I agree drug prohibition sucks but prohibition of drugs is different to prohibition of gambling. it’s hard to stop people making bathtub moonshine. gambling prohibition is harm reduction if done right because a small wager between friends is relatively harmless + ideally in socialism or whatever your buddy won’t be set up to take 10 grand bets off you and all your friends on the game. I’m largely a drug liberationist too but you need some control or at least oversight + intervention mechanisms. and I still believe in a utopian vision where all those vices will be more or less transcended. in end stage communism there will not be liquor stores where you can buy 2 litres of vodka at 4am, that’s harmful. I’m an alcoholic so maybe I do have contradictory views on this but I just deeply believe it’s a societal ill same as gambling. other drugs it’s more of a case by case basis. largely they are still bad, this is a lesson the left should have learned since the 1960s. but again in communism ideally people aren’t feeling the need to get strung out on heroin that shit is a palliative for living in capitalism. so when it comes to drugs it’s more of a utopian transcending the thing but gambling could be effectively tamped down under socialism. even under capitalism it’s probs better if it’s outlawed tbh. sorry it’s unstructured and probably repeated myself just typed my thoughts up very fast.

    • sewer_rat_420 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      For me there should be no abolition, but what has happened is a few predatory companies given free rein to exploit vulnerable people. There were offshore bookies and stuff before, but the level of exploitation (through advertising on mainstream sports networks, not to mention online ads) is unreal and definitely created this problem.

      • RION [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        And it’s crazy how it all sprang up like mushrooms too. Banning ads like they did with cigarettes would help but the cat is already somewhat out of the bag for people who have gotten hooked

    • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think dangerous drugs should be prohibited.

      You think drugs should just be freely available to the public? All of them? You wouldn’t prohibit meth? Heroin? Cocaine?

      • RION [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Are we talking about prohibition or restriction? I fully support restrictions on dangerous drugs, but hasn’t it been consistently shown that outlawing vices entirely doesn’t stop their consumption and just makes it more dangerous (especially for poor people)?

        If we’re basing this off danger, then alcohol is the much more immediate concern given how easily available and culturally accepted it is while still being quite bad for you

        • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          4 hours ago

          outlawing vices entirely doesn’t stop their consumption and just makes it more dangerous (especially for poor people)?

          We’re in a thread about how legalizing sports betting is driving poor people further into poverty. The idea that legalization is inherently harm reduction is completely divorced from reality.

        • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          4 hours ago

          In the United States we have an opioid epidemic fueled by quality controlled, regulated drugs given out by medical professionals in spite of generally widespread knowledge that opioids are dangerous and addictive.

          I think that a lot of people say stuff like what you’re claiming, but I don’t really buy it.

          • imogen_underscore [it/its, she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            it’s the same thing as prison abolition where secretly it’s not really that. I consider myself a drug liberationist but you can’t just let people kill themselves with heroin or take antibiotics whenever. there would still need to be mechanisms of control oversight and intervention. ultimately the goal is to transcend the need for these vices of course.

            • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Aside from causing permanent brain damage?

              Because they impair your judgement and kill you if you take too much which you could easily do do if your judgement is impaired?

              Also, yes it fucking is because of the availability. The reason it became a massive epidemic is that every other doctor in the country became a drug dealer for dangerous recreational drugs.

              • you take too much

                See my previous comment

                Also, yes it fucking is because of the availability. The reason it became a massive epidemic is that every other doctor in the country became a drug dealer for dangerous recreational drugs.

                And why were they doing this? Because the drugs were available or because it was profitable?

                • Aradina [She/They]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  They did it because people came to them and asked for it. Making them over the counter would make this vastly vastly worse in every way.

                • TheLepidopterists [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  See my previous comment

                  I don’t follow. Are you saying that if people understand the dangers of overdosing they’ll quit doing it? Because if so I think you’re ignoring the impaired judgement.

                  And why were they doing this? Because the drugs were available or because it was profitable?

                  The drugs are available because they’re profitable. Giving them to anyone who asks for free won’t make them safer.